Coaching is a serious problem.

Lafleurs Guy

Guuuuuuuy!
Jul 20, 2007
78,787
50,223
it’s worse than that. Gallagher is playing great. Evans is playing great. Anderson is playing decent. Caufield is among the league leaders in goals. Suzuki is producing. We have a kid challenging for the Calder. There is no three goalie carousel.

These are things we have more than last year. Yet somehow the team looks worse. There is a serious problem and ignoring it doesn’t make it go away.
Again.... I don't know why you ignore this - the team had been playing much better before this game and was coming off our best win of the year.

Nobody denies it's been a brutal year. But the team was trending in the right direction. Let's see where it goes from here.
 

Gravity

Generational Poster
Feb 27, 2017
12,422
20,912
In a Barred Spiral
We got off to a horrific start. No question about that.

But we seem to have turned a corner about seven or eight games ago. No, we weren't perfect but the defensive play was so much better. Now we just suffered a blowout again. Is this a blip or was the short stint of improved play the blip? We need to play this out and see.

This is not a great team. Even when I was predicting us to be a better club I wasn't penciling us in for the playoffs. We knew there'd be ups and downs. Even if we go .500 the rest of the way we will still have games like this.

We're coming off our best win of the season. Then we shit the bed. :laugh: That's what .500 teams do. We are consistently inconsistent.
Imo, we haven't turned the corner at any point this season. The players who need to develop are regressing and/or being stifled. Hutson is a remarkable talent but he's not developing much and Slaf is regressing. Suzuki looks off despite producing and CC has gone cold after carrying the team. Looking at D, only Guhle looks stable. Goalies have been ass too.

We can live with losses and team regression so long as the important pieces are developing. That's not happening atm and is alarming.
 

le_sean

Registered User
Oct 21, 2006
42,044
45,241
Those problems are Dach and Matheson, not the coach.
Who keeps putting them in positions to fail over and over again?

If you seriously think the problem is two players, then the coach that keeps giving them infinite opportunities is to blame.

I don’t think the issue is those two specifically though they are part of the problem.
 

Lafleurs Guy

Guuuuuuuy!
Jul 20, 2007
78,787
50,223
Imo, we haven't turned the corner at any point this season. The players who need to develop are regressing and/or being stifled. Hutson is a remarkable talent but he's not developing much and Slaf is regressing. Suzuki looks off despite producing and CC has gone cold after carrying the team. Looking at D, only Guhle looks stable.
We looked brutal to start. Then a six game losing streak before the season was even 20 games old.

But we we've played better since Calgary. That's a measurable quantifiable fact. Were we perfect? No! But we were better. I don't disagree this is a disappointing year. But it's very early. If we get curb stomped repeatedly going forward then it's a different story.
 

Gravity

Generational Poster
Feb 27, 2017
12,422
20,912
In a Barred Spiral
We looked brutal to start. Then a six game losing streak before the season was even 20 games old.

But we we've played better since Calgary. That's a measurable quantifiable fact. Were we perfect? No! But we were better. I don't disagree this is a disappointing year. But it's very early. If we get curb stomped repeatedly going forward then it's a different story.
I edited my message to state that disappointment for me lies not in team outcomes but key player development. That's the regression that's concerning and has not really changed for me.

I don't care if the team gets curb stomped every game so long as key players are producing and growing (which inevitably will lead to less losses).
 

ryan callahan

Registered User
Jan 25, 2014
2,090
1,865
Québec,Canada
Who keeps putting them in positions to fail over and over again?

If you seriously think the problem is two players, then the coach that keeps giving them infinite opportunities is to blame.

I don’t think the issue is those two specifically though they are part of the problem.
Lmao these guys are not GOOD. Could give these guys Scotty Bowman or Jon Cooper and they wouldn't play good.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: The Gr8 Dane

Lafleurs Guy

Guuuuuuuy!
Jul 20, 2007
78,787
50,223
I edited my message to state that disappointment for me lies not in team outcomes but key player development. That's the regression that's concerning and has not really changed for me.

I don't care if the team gets curb stomped every game so long as key players are producing and growing (which inevitably will lead to less losses).
I get it. I think it goes hand in hand. We're not sustaining offensive pressure the way we have. That's going to affect individual performances. See Connor Bedard...

Dach playing as he has has really hurt us.
 

Gravity

Generational Poster
Feb 27, 2017
12,422
20,912
In a Barred Spiral
Lmao hop off their nuts these guys are not GOOD. Could give these guys Scotty Bowman or Jon Cooper and they wouldn't play good.
1000% they could. They could play structured competitive hockey the same way they did last year and the year before under MSL despite having an even worse roster than they do at the moment. Your argument is extremely contradictory.
 

ryan callahan

Registered User
Jan 25, 2014
2,090
1,865
Québec,Canada
1000% they could. They could play structured competitive hockey the same way they did last year and the year before under MSL despite having an even worse roster than they do at the moment. Your argument is extremely contradictory.
Thinking that Matheson was ever a positive at 5v5 with the Habs is seriously delusional. And Dach is not the player he was before all the injuries. There is a reason Chicago gave up on him so easily.
 

HabbyGuy

Registered User
Apr 10, 2003
7,771
13,043
Hamilton Ontario
Visit site
They played structured more competitive hockey last year without Dach and with Matheson.........

Yeah they did, with the exact same guy behind the bench. The D corp is younger than it was last season as well. Say what you want about Kovacevic and Harris but they were steadying players on the backend. Nothing exciting but solid, smart and steady.

It's also not Marty's fault Monahan isn't here anymore, nor that Dach is comng back from a terrible injury. It leaves a big hole at the 2C spot... Also Slaf has struggled early into this season, but under the tutelage of Marty, had a great developmental season last year. (Some would say parabolic growth) Do you think Slaf has all of a sudden forgotten all that he had learned last year over the summer, or all the hard work he and Marty put in? Or is it possible he's just a big bodied young man going through natural growing pains that usually happen to guys with his physical makeup?

As for saying Hutson is not progressing... What more could Lane possibly be doing better as a rookie eating up substantial ice time, he's been nothing short of fantastic all things considered. You're acting like he's stagnating, he's been very VERY good. One of the true bright spots on this team.

Rebuilds can get ugly at times, and it's not always a pretty picture, but it doesnt mean you have to throw out the painting. The frame work is still very much in place.

There's a ton of time left in this season for progression, how about we all just breathe and see how it unfolds?
 
Last edited:

BLONG7

Registered User
Oct 30, 2002
36,902
23,581
Nova Scotia
Visit site
Again.... I don't know why you ignore this - the team had been playing much better before this game and was coming off our best win of the year.

Nobody denies it's been a brutal year. But the team was trending in the right direction. Let's see where it goes from here.
Hey, I look at it and say it's only 20 games.............that said, not the best 20 games at any point either.

Very noticeable, is we are the 2nd youngest team in the league, with an inexperienced NHL coach and in both cases they both allow games to get away from them very quickly and the coach and the team better figure out why and how.
MSL has to grow and develop as a coach, as the team needs to develop.
Marty needs to know when to call a simple timeout and stop the bleeding on some nights, it can change a game in a quick moment. As we have seen not calling a timeout or pulling a goalie, leads to a blowout, and we never need the timeout he so preciously saved ,for no reason.

Again, it's 20 games guys, and the coach and the team can very well grow and develop as the season continues. I refuse to get on the tank thread at this point. Still lots of hockey left.
 

salbutera

Registered User
Sep 10, 2019
15,274
17,088
Hey, I look at it and say it's only 20 games.............that said, not the best 20 games at any point either.

Very noticeable, is we are the 2nd youngest team in the league, with an inexperienced NHL coach and in both cases they both allow games to get away from them very quickly and the coach and the team better figure out why and how.
MSL has to grow and develop as a coach, as the team needs to develop.
Marty needs to know when to call a simple timeout and stop the bleeding on some nights, it can change a game in a quick moment. As we have seen not calling a timeout or pulling a goalie, leads to a blowout, and we never need the timeout he so preciously saved ,for no reason.

Again, it's 20 games guys, and the coach and the team can very well grow and develop as the season continues. I refuse to get on the tank thread at this point. Still lots of hockey left.
To add, 8 of last 9GP have shown significant improvement over first 11GP - VGK are a big veteran / experienced Cup winning team and young players on Habs were given a lesson….IMO that’s how it needs to be viewed.

What’s important now is the teams response in the 3 upcoming games this week vs mediocre Utah, CBJ, and rematch vs NYR who schooled them in Oct.

Have to think Laine’s insertion into lineup will provide a positive morale boost..
 

Theodore450

Registered User
Sep 10, 2013
4,690
2,418
Ask yourself why that peewee coach was hired by this management team for in the first place, and then tell me if he hasn't delivered thus far on his end of the bargain. Perhaps he's earned atleast the rest of the season before we can be surprised, or shocked, if he can or can't make the transition moving forward. Both he and this team have a lot of potential and room to grow.

The management team's vision for this team is still very much on track, despite the inevitable perfectly natural bumps in the road they knew they'd encounter through a rebuild process and green coach. (Unfortunate injuries also haven't helped)

And they're rightfully not going to alter their plan and are determined to see it through, if things need to shift in the future, they'll make those changes accordingly. Until then they're trusting their blueprint to future success.

It's what they were hired to do.

Knee-jerk panicky fans notwithstanding.
Delusions

I stopped reading after three words..

He's done everything they've asked him to do.
He hasn’t raised the value of veterans so we can sell them.
He hasn’t modeled anyone into the type of players that will lead to success.
Has implemented an unaccountable culture while eroding the prior system.
Has allowed favouritism to plague the locker room.


Nobody wants to work in an environment of nepotism. Nobody
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad