Coaching is a serious problem.

Monsieur Miz

Registered User
Nov 3, 2017
4,335
7,726
We hired a guy who never coached to be the coach of the montreal canadiens. I know its old news but its so silly to think about. Our GM hired his friend with zero coaching experience to coach one of the most high pressure and attention hockey franchises in the world.
Same thing could be said about Vincent Lecavalier. Why the f*** was this guy hired lol? Zero experience anywhere.
 

RationalExpectations

Registered User
May 12, 2019
5,243
4,068
I’m fairly confident MSL has the experience necessary to analyze and identify other teams’ systems and adjust accordingly. It’s not magic or rocket science (even if many in this thread seem to think it is). If he’s learning how to make in-game adjustments better, I’m fine with that too. I’m not going to agree with every one of his choices, but I find the team to typically respond well, even if the outcomes aren’t always there. I really don’t think this is an issue related to MSL’s analytical/tactical capacity or fit with the club. I’d be fine if they brought in an experienced assistant coach to provide more support for the defensive group specifically though.

When it comes to Matheson’s minutes, I’d rather Matheson take the heat than Guhle or Hutson. Xhekaj played very poorly to start the year at both ends of the ice and he earned a spot in the press box. Struble and Barron have also sat. This is a non-issue when guys are still getting good minutes. I’d be happy to take Matheson off PP1, but I don’t mind Hutson having the play flow through him with his own unit - even if it’s with fewer skilled players. Matheson isn’t a 1D and shows us that every game, but putting one of our young guys in that position isn’t going to benefit them or the team if they aren’t ready… and I don’t think they are.

The hybrid system is proving to have a steep learning curve for some of our players. That’s the regression. The team might have marginally better outcomes if they moved back to man-to-man or played zone. If things don’t shift soon I’m expecting they might. I don’t expect them to change coaches unless MSL himself wants out.

This hybrid system is based on a flawed hypothesis : that man to man is necessary to apply pressure on your opponent. This is false, because you can apply pressure on any player in the area the coach has defined in your area while making sure high danger areas are always covered as long as you have zone coverage in those areas, which is why zone systems are far superior.

Man to man makes sure you will generate chances in your back except if every single one of your players is better than his own opponent, which is impossible at NHL level.

Really jealous of not having a guy like Brindamour or Maurice behind the bench.
 

Lafleurs Guy

Guuuuuuuy!
Jul 20, 2007
78,799
50,254
This hybrid system is based on a flawed hypothesis : that man to man is necessary to apply pressure on your opponent. This is false, because you can apply pressure on any player in the area the coach has defined in your area while making sure high danger areas are always covered as long as you have zone coverage in those areas, which is why zone systems are far superior.

Man to man makes sure you will generate chances in your back except if every single one of your players is better than his own opponent, which is impossible at NHL level.

Really jealous of not having a guy like Brindamour or Maurice behind the bench.
The system doesn't work, it doesn't necessarily mean the coach sucks. We could throw the system out and see if that works.

Totally get why they're trying this but it's clear that it doesn't work.
 

Draft

Registered User
Jan 23, 2013
8,615
5,479
This hybrid system is based on a flawed hypothesis : that man to man is necessary to apply pressure on your opponent. This is false, because you can apply pressure on any player in the area the coach has defined in your area while making sure high danger areas are always covered as long as you have zone coverage in those areas, which is why zone systems are far superior.

Man to man makes sure you will generate chances in your back except if every single one of your players is better than his own opponent, which is impossible at NHL level.

Really jealous of not having a guy like Brindamour or Maurice behind the bench.

Are you aware that Maurice uses a very similar hybrid system to what MSL has implemented? Or that Brind’Amour relies heavily on man-on-man and has been criticized for it when it falls apart come playoffs?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Weltschmerz

CHwest

Talent sets the floor, character sets the ceiling.
May 24, 2011
3,778
5,050
This hybrid system is based on a flawed hypothesis : that man to man is necessary to apply pressure on your opponent. This is false, because you can apply pressure on any player in the area the coach has defined in your area while making sure high danger areas are always covered as long as you have zone coverage in those areas, which is why zone systems are far superior.

Man to man makes sure you will generate chances in your back except if every single one of your players is better than his own opponent, which is impossible at NHL level.

Really jealous of not having a guy like Brindamour or Maurice behind the bench.
As am I, but we all know why that will never happen.
 

1909

Registered User
Jul 6, 2016
21,287
11,809
We hired a guy who never coached to be the coach of the montreal canadiens. I know its old news but its so silly to think about. Our GM hired his friend with zero coaching experience to coach one of the most high pressure and attention hockey franchises in the world.
And our GM was a rookie too selected by a friend, Gorton…..

As am I, but we all know why that will never happen.
That is your obsession, right ? Habs have won 24 Championships with a blend of French and on-French speaking players. And ALL the coaches (except for one) were bilingual since Blake.
I was totally against the hiring of MSL, But there were other way better options out there.
 
Last edited:

1909

Registered User
Jul 6, 2016
21,287
11,809
How many more games for MSL behind the bench ?

The next two road games should give the answer.
 

CHwest

Talent sets the floor, character sets the ceiling.
May 24, 2011
3,778
5,050
And our GM was a rookie too selected by a friend, Gorton…..


That is your obsession, right ? Habs have won 24 Championships with a blend of French and on-French speaking players. And ALL the coaches (except for one) were bilingual since Blake.
I was totally against the hiring of MSL, But there were other way better options out there.
I'll take anyone, but I am the obsessed one.:laugh:
 

teamfirst

Registered User
Oct 28, 2016
3,972
2,621
I'll take anyone, but I am the obsessed one.:laugh:

Nah, you're obsess about that ....own it.

There is no acceptable way to put a product like that in front of 21,000 fans who paid huge $$$$$ for a competitive, entertaining show.

something as to give that's for sure, the guy's seems to have quit on the coach, anyway we'll see
 

RationalExpectations

Registered User
May 12, 2019
5,243
4,068
Are you aware that Maurice uses a very similar hybrid system to what MSL has implemented? Or that Brind’Amour relies heavily on man-on-man and has been criticized for it when it falls apart come playoffs?
This is completely false actually. Brind amour has one of the most strict zone coverage in the league. The issue with CAR is scoring goals in the playoffs much more than defense.

The only thing is that his Dzone coverage is cut in very large areas but the slot is always covered by somedbody as soon as someone leaves it.
 
Last edited:

CHwest

Talent sets the floor, character sets the ceiling.
May 24, 2011
3,778
5,050
yes you are. You don’t lose any minutes at any time to point that over and over.
I point it out because it's true and it hinders the team, I would suggest you are the obsessed one because where I say it there you are. :nod: :laugh:
 

Draft

Registered User
Jan 23, 2013
8,615
5,479
This is completely false actually. Brind amour has one of the most strict zone coverage in the league. The issue with CAR is scoring goals in the playoffs much more than defense.

The only thing is that to some his Dzone coverage is cut in very large areas but the slot is always covered by somedbody as soon as someone leaves it.

Not false and doubling down is kind of embarrassing. If you can’t tell by watching it yourself, you can look it up. You’re welcome to reference the following:







No comment on Maurice using a hybrid system? Surely a brilliant coach like that wouldn’t work off such a faulty hypothesis.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HabbyGuy

HabzSauce

Registered User
Jun 10, 2022
1,749
2,402
I'm talking about what I'm seeing. Gally was apparently yelling at his bench last night and it doesn't appear it had any effect on the team. His playing hard with Evans since the season started and nobody else on the roster is following.
If the kids don't respect gally they need to be traded. Don't think that's the issue tho this team just sucks. Something stinky is going around in that locker room
 

RationalExpectations

Registered User
May 12, 2019
5,243
4,068
Not false and doubling down is kind of embarrassing. If you can’t tell by watching it yourself, you can look it up. You’re welcome to reference the following:







No comment on Maurice using a hybrid system? Surely a brilliant coach like that wouldn’t work off such a faulty hypothesis.

First most of the explications are based on the forechecking part of the strategy. Sure they are agressive on the puck carrier. In their Dzone these "analysts" just mention they play man to man but don't justify it.
Just look at CAR games ans tell me how often the slot is open, how often a Dman leaves the front of the net without anybody replacing him ?
The thing is that CAR IS so efficient on the forecheck that they don't often need to be on the backcheck.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad