ACLEVERNAME
Registered User
- Jan 6, 2010
- 7,564
- 6,674
If Chychrun is as flawed as a number of Ottawa fans are suggesting, what team is offering much of anything to trade for him? According to some he doesn't hit, doesn't play much actual defense, and struggles with passing and reading the game. The consensus is that at least he can skate and shoot. Is that worth what he's getting on his deal at all or is he actually better than the harsher critics suggest? If Ottawa struggled the way it did and has several players better than Chychrun at the same position doesn't that sort of suggest he's terrible overall? Doesn't that make him a cap dump? I can't imagine he's as bad as the critics suggest.
That's fair and makes sense. If the relationship is unsalvageable they can certainly trade him at the draft, but it likely won't be for a great return. Alternatively, they can try to compete next season, keep him and maybe he's a self rental. If the team falters again they can probably trade him with retention at the deadline for something similar to what they would get in the summer. If he's a third option in Ottawa I'm not sure how many teams he'd be a first option on at this point.I think a number of posters are being overly critical but for Ottawa it hasn't been a good fit. Chychrun is a good player who didn't get a shot to thrive because he didn't have the support around him defensively and offensively other players were preferred. He is an offensive D, who was often the third option in offensive situations. He wasn't the go to option in any situation and his defensive deficincies were highlighted because the team as a whole struggled to keep pucks out of the net.
I don't think the relationship is unsalvageable whatsoever... I dont think there is bad blood, just bad fit... but I also don't think its in anyones best interest to drag this out.That's fair and makes sense. If the relationship is unsalvageable they can certainly trade him at the draft, but it likely won't be for a great return. Alternatively, they can try to compete next season, keep him and maybe he's a self rental. If the team falters again they can probably trade him with retention at the deadline for something similar to what they would get in the summer. If he's a third option in Ottawa I'm not sure how many teams he'd be a first option on at this point.
I guess they look for a change of scenery type trade for him. Maybe hope to get someone with an extra year of term.I don't think the relationship is unsalvageable whatsoever... I dont think there is bad blood, just bad fit... but I also don't think its in anyones best interest to drag this out.
That's fair and makes sense. If the relationship is unsalvageable they can certainly trade him at the draft, but it likely won't be for a great return. Alternatively, they can try to compete next season, keep him and maybe he's a self rental. If the team falters again they can probably trade him with retention at the deadline for something similar to what they would get in the summer. If he's a third option in Ottawa I'm not sure how many teams he'd be a first option on at this point.
Probably best to keep him until the deadline, but what would be the expected ask?
Typically more demand for a player when near deadline due to cap spaceWhy? They will get max value this summer, with the acquiring team having him for all of next season and having a full year to negotiate an extension.
Typically more demand for a player when near deadline due to cap space
With banking, usually not true I think. Being able to bank like 1M into 4M let’s a good a number of contenders finance acquisitionsTeams typically have more cap space in the off season, or at least more options to make cap space.
With banking, usually not true I think. Being able to bank like 1M into 4M let’s a good a number of contenders finance acquisitions
Sure.Love Gavrikov but Kings need puck movers. Well that and a GM, a coach, a goalie and probably better fans than myself.
Gavrikov and Kaliyev for Chychrun and a 3rd. ?
Love Gavrikov but Kings need puck movers. Well that and a GM, a coach, a goalie and probably better fans than myself.
Gavrikov and Kaliyev for Chychrun and a 3rd. ?
Would love Chabot but could not afgord the contract.I wouldn't call Chychrun a puck mover. That's Chabot.
no thank you. LA needs more stay at home type of D-men not puck movers. We will have Doughty, Spence and Clarke on the right side next year. Should be able to move the puck with them.Love Gavrikov but Kings need puck movers. Well that and a GM, a coach, a goalie and probably better fans than myself.
Gavrikov and Kaliyev for Chychrun and a 3rd. ?
Chychrun seems to sour rather quickly.
I’m surprised that he didn’t pan out with Ottawa. He seems like a solid two way player but as you’ve noted team building requires balance and he just hasn’t fit long term there. I’m sure he will find a good landing spot but my guess is Ottawa will have limited spots to trade him based on where he will be open to an extension.I don't think there's any shame in being behind Sanderson and Chabot, they are both very strong in transition. He doesn't need to be the #1 D but just more offensive opportunity and more support defensively. Boston, Minnesota and St. Louis are some teams I could see him doing well with. When it comes to team building you need a mix of players that balance each other. It's not just about having the best players. With Ottawa, they lacked a good mix of players that can fill different roles. Chyrchrun wasn't abl;e to evolve his game to what they needed. Him and Chabot filled the exact same role and didn't have stronger options defensively outside of Sanderson and Zub.
This is not a good idea. What if Ottawa is in a playoff spot? You're really going to deal him then? I doubt it. Trade him now for assets. Don't get yourself in a Philly situation.Probably best to keep him until the deadline, but what would be the expected ask?
Love Gavrikov but Kings need puck movers. Well that and a GM, a coach, a goalie and probably better fans than myself.
Gavrikov and Kaliyev for Chychrun and a 3rd. ?