Blue and Green
Out to lunch
- Dec 17, 2017
- 3,812
- 5,664
I don't understand what that means... and it doesn't seem to address the point that I made. You've been claiming that the level of CHL is going to weaken significantly and I don't see any basis for that argument. The days of CHL holding almost all of its players for four years, those are over... but so are the days of CHL not being able to access a load of D1-bound talent.The talk of parallel paths prior to ncaa as we hit a point upcoming five years when the junior age Canadian and American players will soon be close to equal. Of course Canadians should likely opt for their own domestic pathway.
You're left to explain why the CHL brass, whom I have to believe are more informed on this issue than any of us are, were at the least not worried about this change and actually seemed to think that it would be a net positive for their leagues. Perhaps it won't be a positive but it's hard to see how it's going to be a significant net negative. The handwringing was coming from the brass of other junior leagues.