Puckstopper
Registered User
- Oct 19, 2006
- 131
- 47
You know that many drafts you don't get much better than Byram for 4? Do all these over-raters of draft picks on HF ever go back and look at the draft history for the whole league?
If you back to the very first draft and look at any draft, there are about 30 good players at most, and by the time you hit 20 deep in many drafts you are already at names that aren't that exciting or even good. That is over 200 names each year for a lot of years and you barely have one round worth of good stuff. There are 3rd and 4th line grinders who end up being 20th-30th best in their draft year.
I don't think that's necessarily the point. Byram was walking either way, so Buffalo had limited leverage. If we the public know, Chicago knows it. To give the 4th OA is a massive return, and I certainly hope they have him ready to sign an extension, otherwise it's even more of a disaster. Another point, there are only so many spots for offensive dmen. As good as Byram was in Buffalo, he wanted more playing time and money. We just saw a disgruntled Nemec get dealt. And now Davidson has seemingly gone from "Korchinski's our guy" to Levshunov, and now Byram. It's like he gets infatuated with his new toy and envisions this dream scenario of an elite #1 dman, and when they don't live up he moves on to the next guy. The asset management is all over the place.


