
YesWas Crevier any good this year?
could have traded 4 ova for Robertson or Knies in some package similar to this to help Bedard. Thats why this is so insane.I remember hearing that a large portion of scouts hate this entire draft class. One scout commenting on how he would trade all his picks away and not take anyone. If there is any consensus on this I can see why Chicago might trade away the 4oa. BB was also a 4th oa pick and is still young enough to have not peaked yet. Chicago needs to start winning or risk losing Bedard. It could be another 2~3 years before 4th oa starts to contribute.
I guess I am in the minority but I think Chicago did ok with this one.
his analytics were good last 2 years. He was the #1 RD on Chicago at the end of the year.Was Crevier any good this year?
Was Crevier any good this year?
could have traded 4 ova for Robertson or Knies in some package similar to this to help Bedard. Thats why this is so insane.
I remember hearing that a large portion of scouts hate this entire draft class. One scout commenting on how he would trade all his picks away and not take anyone. If there is any consensus on this I can see why Chicago might trade away the 4oa. BB was also a 4th oa pick and is still young enough to have not peaked yet. Chicago needs to start winning or risk losing Bedard. It could be another 2~3 years before 4th oa starts to contribute.
I guess I am in the minority but I think Chicago did ok with this one.

I think byram is a top pairing d. Good deal for both sides.This is insane. Was I sleeping on Byram?? Or am i going crazy
How the hell did the Blackhawks add on top of that
Rumor also is Chicago offered Levshunov for Knies straight up iirc and it was late or something but would have gone through at the TDL? at any rate this exact trade for Knies over Byram would have been more palatable because Bedard needs a linemate. This essentially takes a strength at RD and trades it for a strength at LD which is ok on its face but doesnt help the forward core at all which arguably needs the most help.Rumour is Chicago offered the Leafs that pick already for Knies and they said no. I don’t know if Dallas is trading Robertson for futures either.
Chicago really wanted to trade that pick.
Byram has also said many times he wants to be 1D and on PP1. Looks like he'll be getting his wish. He's already won a cup and is young so maybe being on a rebuilding team is OK with him.Byram wanted too much money, Kesselring didn't fit the system
A whole year younger than Quinn Hughes.he just turned 25,,,still young for a D
Yep the 3 extras are what push it over to a crazy return especially the greenway dump of salary - plus sounds like the D we got back could be more than I initially thoughtI'll be honest I think the 4OA for Byram straight up is probably fair. My honest assessment is Byram is a #3 with potential for more. I badly wanted to keep him in Buffalo's elite top 4. Given the context of Byram kind of forcing Buffalo's hand/contract uncertainty, I did expect less than 4OA but ultimately I think if Byram is signed (and not to 12M) that it's fine for Chicago. 4OA can definitely bust and Byram is proven with potential for a higher ceiling. I think 55+ points is very possible every year for him with more PP time.
The add ons seem excessive. 45OA, plus a solid bottom pair D? Plus taking on Greenway? In my opinion they overpaid by these 3 extra things.