Meandmyself
Registered User
- Mar 5, 2010
- 283
- 35
If you watched him you wouldn’t say thatThat's really easy to say about a 115 point player in hindsight, absolutely nobody expected him to rapidly fall off and become a 40-50 point middle six winger during the regular season, even if you doubted his playoff ability.
The general perception was that Johnny Hockey had Tkachuk overperforming offensively at the time.
I was close, but it gets better folks, the Sabres aren’t done.4th over all.
Bo was a 4th over all, so it would be a 4th over all + for Bo since he’s established.
Yeah true maybe Davidson valued him as worth a pair of 1stsPersonally, I don't think Greenway is a cap dump and given his play when he cares, he's a rare type of player.
Or McKenna and Bjorck....let's visit Fantasy Land for a minute:
...Buffalo trades 4th Overall + something mid + Tuch's rights to Toronto for Knies...Toronto drafts McKenna 1st Overall & Reid 4th Overall...
...this Montreal fan cries...![]()
"Hockey reasons"Do you think the league is ever like
"Seriously, guys?"
during the trade call?
Personally, I don't think Greenway is a cap dump and given his play when he cares, he's a rare type of player.
I think Jarmo has Davidson's nudes or this trade doesn't make sense.
You should though. Good young defenseman always trumps a good young winger.William Eklund (and some prospect friends) went for the 9th overall today.
In no world do I value Bo Byram higher than William Eklund.
And he just went for the 4th overall+.
I'm floored.

If someone created a thread with this exact trade (thus far) earlier today, the thread would get locked instantly. And the OP might get a warning. That's how awful it looks.Right now it's too good to be true. Feels like there will be more to it.
Is this good young defenseman who's better than William Eklund in the room with us? Because all I see is Bo Byram.You should though. Good young defenseman always trumps a good young winger.
Or McKenna and Bjorck.