Dead Coyote
Registered User
- Oct 10, 2017
- 2,772
- 3,305
I like how Lafreniere is listed in two different drafts
Wait until it decides over your employment and insurances.
so it not just meAny reason why it seems to have forgot Taylor Hall for 2010?
and they are a few tiers apart !and Boldy is listed twice in the same draft (as Matt and Matthew)
Marner didn’t make the first round either.Straight up missing Kaprizov in 2015, apparently the universe just decided he was never going to be a first rounder.
He's probably a conservative, chatGPT isn't actually openAI, it's programmed to create things based on a pre-determined set of viewsAny reason why it seems to have forgot Taylor Hall for 2010?
When will people understand that so-called AI can’t actually think in any capacity, and can do nothing more than imitate human language? You might as well ask a parrot.
No one's paying attention to that until it's far too late.Wait until it decides over your employment and insurances.
You're sort of selling it short. It's akin to google except it can generate answers to questions that people might not have answered before, and can at least point you in the right direction.When will people understand that so-called AI can’t actually think in any capacity, and can do nothing more than imitate human language? You might as well ask a parrot.
I highly doubt that. It constantly struggles with computing mathematical expressions correctly (even the most trivial ones) and rarely provides valuable insight into the implementation of source code for computer programs. Both of these are very formal and mechanical tasks.You're sort of selling it short. It's akin to google except it can generate answers to questions that people might not have answered before, and can at least point you in the right direction.
Also, it's far superior to humans in complex mechanical problems, especially ones that can trick the human brain's assumptions.
Something like ChatGPT generates its answers by using random noise, which means that its answer to the same question is probably different every single time. And yeah, it's not as useful for specialized purposes, because it's very general and censored.
Take these draft rankings, for example. They're not great. But what if you had created a model specifically to rank NHL players? It would likely perform far better.
According to people reaction everytime humans do one in the media, it could be just something impossible to do.inability to do rankings on hockey players
One could even say that human inability to do consistent rankings with solid underlying reasoning is why the generative AI is so bad at it.According to people reaction everytime humans do one in the media, it could be just something impossible to do.