Dennis Bonvie
Registered User
I would add Quinn Hughes to the list of Dmen more impactful than McAvoy.
This year's Norris winner.
I would add Quinn Hughes to the list of Dmen more impactful than McAvoy.
He is a less offensive Drew Doughty. That's fine- he's a number one defenceman, but it is clear he is a notch below the real elite defenceman of the NHL.
He still absolutely can be a top-5 guy. Wasn't this year for sure, but I think for the previous 2-3 seasons before this year he was right there. IIRC barely missed a Norris nomination a few years in a row. Injuries and suspensions have stopped him from consistently being there.It's his offensive instincts (or lack thereof) that really separate him from the true top end guys.
So he's probably not a Top 5 D-man in this league. But there is no shame with being in the Top 10 (which I believe he is).
He still absolutely can be a top-5 guy. Wasn't this year for sure, but I think for the previous 2-3 seasons before this year he was right there. IIRC barely missed a Norris nomination a few years in a row. Injuries and suspensions have stopped him from consistently being there.
He did not have a good round 1 - would be huge if he could step up. He'll need to be good and physical against Florida. He doesn't need to be a world-beater if our defense plays like they can/should, but he needs to be better along with all of our top guys.
Totally agree on all counts. Guys like Chara/Keith/Doughty would be perennial candidates/winners for (I'm greatly simplifying/understating here) being steady, all-around defenseman. The game has changed and winners recently have been guys with absurd points, not at all to discount their impact/talent.I think offensively he is what he is. But part of him not being Top 5 right now is his competition. Here you have a year from Victor Hedman who was basically a PPG and won't get be a Norris nominee.
The top 5 D right now to me is Makar, Hughes, Josi, Hedman and Fox. McAvoy and Fox are awfully close without the puck but I got to give he nod to Fox with the puck. McAvoy is that next tier with the likes of Dahlin and Heiskanen.
Charlie is a top 10 NHL Dman
In this thread we complain about it
Sure and the older defenseman above him or at his level won’t be! Such is life and time!Younger DMen like Hughes, Faber & Sanderson will be at his level soon.
McAvoy actually has a slightly better points per game average in the regular season.He is a less offensive Drew Doughty. That's fine- he's a number one defenceman, but it is clear he is a notch below the real elite defenceman of the NHL.
He’s definitely improved it since he came into the league at least.Charlie is an elite skater and puck mover. He plays with some snarl. He is the total package.
Charlie just needs to work on the accuracy of his shot. Look at the goal Lindholm scored in game seven. He aimed that accurately. I would like to see Charlie do that. His shot can be improved. That will make him elite.
Sure and the older defenseman above him or at his level won’t be! Such is life and time!
Sure and the older defenseman above him or at his level won’t be! Such is life and time!
incredible!!!!!Fantastic.There's still hope.
First Norris wins:
Bourque - 26 years old
Chelios -27
Lidstrom - 30
Blake - 28
Keith - 26
Doughty - 26
Hedman - 27
Jossi - 29
Bobby Orr -26 (last of 8)
I think it’s because many feel he can be even better. I don’t view it as “complaining” so much as hoping for improvement because we know it’s possible, and feels likely.Charlie is a top 10 NHL Dman
In this thread we complain about it
24:30 TOI last night. Hampus played 22:28. Every other D man with the exception of Lohrei played just over 18 minutes. Loheri played 16:05.The guy's playing 25-30min a night for us and is an absolute horse. I don't care who you are, when you are playing those kinds of minutes (a lot of them high leverage), you're gonna have a tough shift every once in a while.
I think people are way too harsh on this guy. His best hockey is still in front of him and he's a future Captain. Yeah, he's not Cale Makar.....
The moment he sorts out his spacing (away from the puck) in the O zone and shoots more, he becomes a Vezina level guy. We'll see if he gets there.
Is Mac perfect? No.
However, this is one of those you don't know what you have until you don't scenarios. Our defense would be a shell of itself without him. And that's no exaggeration.
Charlie McAvoy can play on my team any damn time he wants.
24:30 TOI last night. Hampus played 22:28. Every other D man with the exception of Lohrei played just over 18 minutes. Loheri played 16:05.
He also had 5 hits. Forbort back meant that he didn't have to block so many shots.
They need to take minutes off of Mac. As you said, he's an absolute horse but they need to help the horse.
I loved that he was clearing guys in front of the net.
He's not a bad as people are making it seem. Give more minutes to Loheri to balance the D and we will see a better Charlie.