Proposal: Chariot & Debrusk

[Crow52]

Mtl: Debrusk
Bos: Chariot & "22 2nd Rd pick

Click to read more...

 

[BLNY]

I'd prefer a Chiarot for Dubresk trade.

 

[LeProspector]

Go back to cap friendly lmao

 

[Just a Fan]

I can't figure out why Montreal would do this?

 

[BleedBlue14]

Could be a good base for a hockey trade. Doubt there would be anything significant added to either side.

Not entirely sure if MTL would covet Debrusk but if they had a use for him this could probably work 1-1

 

[Crow52]

I think Debrusk 25yrs, ca be a good middle six impact player for Mtl.
Chariot solves some defensive concerns for Boston for the playoffs and potentially resign with the Bruins. The 2nd pick was of the age difference.

 

[FrankMTL]

Would not give up our 2nd (which is equal to a late first). Debrusk does nothing for me. I'd rather just trade Chiarot for a draft pick.

 

[SkullKing]

Do not want Chiarot

 

[CTHabsfan]

Rumor is trading Ben Chiarot will bring a 1st-round pick to the Canadiens. Why does Montreal trade an early 2nd-rounder and Chiarot and only get back Jake Debrusk?

 

[HOPE]

Debrusk does not fetch a late first round.

 

[Mick Riddleton]

Chiarot is so over rated on these boards, guy is nothing special

 

[Wayfarer13]

Chiarot is so over rated on these boards, guy is nothing special

Translation. He plays on a team I do not support..

 

[Treb]

Why are we giving up 2022 picks?

 

[WhalerTurnedBruin55]

This doesn't make sense for Montreal at all.


Not sure Chariot is the answer to the Bruins problems either.

 

[WinterLion]

I could see the Habs taking a chance on Debrusk, but not for Chiarot. I think they would want to get rid of a contract they don't love for him.

 

[Habs 4 Life]

No thanks, I prefer picks and prospects

 

[pth2]

Would not give up our 2nd (which is equal to a late first). Debrusk does nothing for me. I'd rather just trade Chiarot for a draft pick.

Came here to say this.

Habs 2nd will be in the 35 range, and they could apparently get a pick in the 25 range for Chiarot.
So it's equivalent to 25+35 for Debrusk, which seems insanely expensive, in asset terms.

 

[Gaylord Q Tinkledink]

This is an easy pass from Montreal.

 

[domiwroze]

Does the exact opposite of what MTL is trying to do, also, value is waay off, we won't trade a 33th ov pick for Debrusk on top of giving up a 1st+ that Chiarot will bring back

 

[Mick Riddleton]

Translation. He plays on a team I do not support..

Translation - He is not a good player and you have not watched DeBrusk lately

 

[samsagat]

Actually, I'm not even sure Debrusk would fetch MTL (early) 2nd Rd pick.

Chiarot, want it or not, is a valuable rental player by NHL standard.

He is so because playoff hockey is a totally different beast.
A beast defensemen like Chiarot handle properly.

 

[HabsWhiteKnightLOL]

This can't be serious , we are giving the extra 2nd?

 

[blankall]

Montreal's second is going to be just like a late 1st. Not an asset Montreal should be trading.

 

[Mersss]

Chiarot is worth a 1st on his own.

No waynis DeBrusk worth a 1st + 2nd lol

 

[HuGort]

Mtl: Debrusk
Bos: Chariot & "22 2nd Rd pick

Sounds like a Bergevin trade.

How is Debrusk any better than a Pitlick who we picked up on waivers? Let alone give up a high 2nd and a playoff warrior