Chara crosscheck to Gallagher’s neck (Update: fined $5k)

ArGarBarGar

What do we want!? Unfair!
Sep 8, 2008
44,074
11,863
Go find it.

There’s going to be bickering regardless, has nothing to do with photos.
You are 100% wrong.

If you want to compare situations, it is up to you to provide the necessary information to compare them. I'm not doing your research for you.
 

ArGarBarGar

What do we want!? Unfair!
Sep 8, 2008
44,074
11,863
1:48 of video titled “Pastrnak & Gallagher get into it”

Pastrnak is engaged, Gallagher comes in from the side, stick horizontal and gets Pastrnak in the neck.
Is there a specific reason you are doing everything except embedding the video on here?
 

PatriceBergeronFan

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jul 15, 2011
61,644
40,323
USA
You are 100% wrong.

If you want to compare situations, it is up to you to provide the necessary information to compare them. I'm not doing your research for you.

That screen shot is quite clear.... I imagine it would take a few moments of your time to find it if you so desire.


Is there a specific reason you are doing everything except embedding the video on here?

You now have all the material you need to find it. Not everyone is skilled with embedding video in a forum.
 

uncleben

Global Moderator
Dec 4, 2008
14,874
9,945
Acton, Ontario
another incident, and he’s considered a repeat offender. That’s why they fine.
Suspensions and fines count separately for repeat offender status.

Repeat offender for suspensions is if they are suspended within an 18 month window preceding the current suspension; a fine does not influence the status of a suspension. If they are deemed so, then their salary lost due to games played is calculated not by days in the season (186 in this season), but by games in a season (82).

E.g. A player making $6,000,000, suspended 2 games.
Non-repeat - $6,000,000/186 days * 2 games = $64,516.13 lost
Repeat - $6,000,000/82 games * 2 games = $146,341.46 lost

Repeat offender for fines is if they are fined within an 12 month window preceding the current fine; a suspension does not influence the fine of a suspension. If they are deemed repeat this only increases the maximum possible fine, if they would have previously hit the ceiling. Players can be fined up to 50% of one day's salary, up to a maximum of $10,000.00 for their first offense, and $15,000.00 if a repeat offender.

E.g. A player making $6,000,000, fined.
Non-repeat - $6,000,000/186 days * 0.5 = $16,129.03 => capped at $10,000
Repeat - $6,000,000/186 days * 0.5 = $16,129.03 => capped at $15,000

For Chara specifically then, this will have no direct bearing on if he gets a suspension (I say no direct bearing because it won't give him a repeat offender status, but DOPS can still consider a player's history at any time in their career, whether they were suspended, fined, or had no disciplinary action imposed on them, when deciding on a length of a suspension) AND, it would have no bearing anyway if he gets fined again in the next year!

Chara, $2,000,000:
Non-repeat - $2,000,000/186 days * 0.5 = $5,376.34 => does not reach $10,000 cap
Repeat - $2,000,000/186 days * 0.5 = $5,376.34 => does not reach $15,000 cap; no difference

Chara, this time around wasn't even fined his maximum.
The NHL press release states he was fined the maximum allowable, BUT $5,000 is the maximum the League can hand out without having to offer a telephone hearing (CBA 18.7 (d)).
Which is to say, if they fined him is true max, or anything above $5,000, that would require DOPS to host a telephone hearing, where they would have to provide evidence and argument, and give Chara a chance to defend himself. This way, they can just slap the fine on him, and pat themselves on the back, with no extra work.


TL;DR: As much as we say the suspension system is broken, fines are an absolute pittance and a JOKE.
 

kingpest19

Registered User
Sep 21, 2004
12,348
779
Chara faced no discipline, not even 2 minutes, after smashing Kadri's head into the glass last postseason. It's painfully obvious that the league has a different rulebook for certain players.
It's been that way for years. Look at the difference in suspension lengths for Chris Simon and Chris Pronger for the same thing. Both had prior suspensions the year before but one guy got 30 games and one got 8 games.
 

Sheppy

Registered User
Nov 23, 2011
58,680
64,633
The Arctic
It's been that way for years. Look at the difference in suspension lengths for Chris Simon and Chris Pronger for the same thing. Both had prior suspensions the year before but one guy got 30 games and one got 8 games.
Not even in the same hemisphere of being “the same thing”
 

Maitz

Registered User
Aug 3, 2006
3,509
2,347
Montreal
Don’t care about that, it happens a lot but what about marchand speared on petry?? That deserves a suspension
 

paulhiggins

Registered User
Feb 4, 2006
2,807
827
Equivalent to about 50 bucks in working guy money. He has cronies Jeremy and Gary to thank for that. What about the 10,000 x-checks he didn't get anything for? Jeremy and Gary again.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad