Power Man
Grrrr
Yes, but if you watch the Man City games you can see they have been very inconsistent, and they haven't found the right CB partnership yet
If/when Dominik Szoboszlai goes to RB Leipzig, would he be cup-tied to Salzburg for UCL ?
If/when Dominik Szoboszlai goes to RB Leipzig, would he be cup-tied to Salzburg for UCL ?
Great for your PL title run though.Atletico is probably the matchup I wanted least, f***. Terrible stylistic opponent for us.
I think they updated it a couple years back so that cup-ties reset for the knockout stages.
Pretty sure that Leipzig can add him to their CL squad for the knockouts.
It’s not. It encourages teams to sit on one goal leads and not play.Away goals is a fantastic rule.
And not having away goals produces away team that try for 0-0 draws and gives an unfair advantage to return home teams.
I used to think that was the case, but after some more years of watching I really don’t think that’s the case. You can’t win a game 0-0, and either way the emphasis would be more so to having to attack both legs instead of just one.And not having away goals produces away team that try for 0-0 draws and gives an unfair advantage to return home teams.
This too. Away goals are too valuable a commodity.On the other side it produces home teams who are much less likely to attack for fear of giving up a significant away goal.
If you go up 1-0 it’s far more advantageous to sit on it versus risking giving up an away goal.
I agree, it can result in great 2nd legs and dramaAway goals is a fantastic rule.
Golden goals or straight to PKs. I know, too American. Sorry.I rather away goals than games getting extra time. But... who knows.
But not because of away goals. Because teams had to score. No away goals encourages more scoring. It’s just as likely to set up boring formality 2nd legs as it is to set up “drama”I agree, it can result in great 2nd legs and drama
That Chelsea- PSG 2nd leg a few years ago was amazing lol
Which is still better than away teams bunkering down, italian 90s style.On the other side it produces home teams who are much less likely to attack for fear of giving up a significant away goal.
If you go up 1-0 it’s far more advantageous to sit on it versus risking giving up an away goal.
It was totally because of away goals.But not because of away goals. Because teams had to score. No away goals encourages more scoring. It’s just as likely to set up boring formality 2nd legs as it is to set up “drama”
Why? Would they have not had to score either way?It was totally because of away goals.
I think they updated it a couple years back so that cup-ties reset for the knockout stages.
Not if you watched the Chelsea/PSG game.Why? Would they have not had to score either way?
Am I thinking of the wrong game?Not if you watched the Chelsea/PSG game.