I don't know tbh. But both times the line used was used after the ball had left the player's foot.Don't they use the semi automated offsides in the champions league? which should mean lines aren't drawn and it's the cgi used?
I don't know tbh. But both times the line used was used after the ball had left the player's foot.Don't they use the semi automated offsides in the champions league? which should mean lines aren't drawn and it's the cgi used?
I think the semi automated stuff is still checked by a human in close cases though.
I don't know tbh. But both times the line used was used after the ball had left the player's foot.
I thought that was for the subjective stuff like interfering with play?
If you're using what was posted on that twitter account then it's not what UEFA used, someone's edited it themselves, this is what the UEFA VAR checks look like.
Incidentally that account also drew the lines from the PSG player at a slight angle headed right instead of straight down, so even if they used the 'right frame' it still would have been offside if they'd drawn their own line properly.
But the whole point of the guy is to show that the UEFA offside was made too late since the ball had left the passers foot.
They clearly used the wrong frame.Even if UEFA used the wrong frame (they didn't), in the image he used it's still offside if you draw the yellow lines correctly, he's slanted them to the right for the PSG player in the first example, and in the other example in his thread to the left for the city player to make the PSG player seem onside in both instances.
So either way the correct decision was made and that person is either really bad at drawing vertical lines, or deliberately misleading people for engagement