PSG fans are insane. They rocked Liverpool and other places.I was hearing the PSG fans more, and your players repeatedly gestured at the crowd asking for support.
PSG fans are insane. They rocked Liverpool and other places.I was hearing the PSG fans more, and your players repeatedly gestured at the crowd asking for support.
Yeah the goal is a low xG but well taken after 27 passes.Only got to watch the highlights because of work, but I'm not sure how you can so confidently say that PSG deserved more. Arsenal's best chances (Martinelli and Trossard) were higher quality than PSG's goal, and so was the Doue chance for that matter. Fantastic finish by Dembele for the goal, but hypothetically if he hadn't scored and PSG rather scored from the Doue chance, then you aren't taking that Dembele chance and saying "wow they should have been 2-0 up."
Opta xG was Arsenal 1.65 - 1.14 PSG
Yeah that's a mistake.CBS Sports extended highlights. Maybe they didn't show something or I'm not remembering now, but to me Arsenal had 2 of the 3 best chances in the game (Martinelli and Trossard chances vs Doue chance), which all required great saves from the GKs. I'm not saying we definitely deserved a result more than PSG deserved 1-0, but the game ultimately came down to a fantastic finish from Dembele and some excellent saves from Donarumma (2) and Raya (1).
I looked at the xG map again to see if I missed something and it's actually kinda flawed, because it's counting some of the missed chances that were actually offside (Saka cross to Martinelli, Barcola chance). So xG should be around Arsenal 0.85 - 0.82 PSG. Wasn't clear to me if the Ramos chance where he toe poked it off the crossbar was onside or offside.
Anyways, we're gunna need a big performance in Paris next week.
Barcola wasn’t, true. But the player who played him in was. So the Barcola chance would have beenNo Barcola was not offside. Not even close in fact. Ramos might have been (still unsure).
As for the last second tackle on Merino it's true, the same way Saliba made a last second tackle in the second half.
I answered it already. Ramos wasn't offside per the replays. Covered up the pitch (on the Barcola chance).Barcola wasn’t, true. But the player who played him in was. So the Barcola chance would have been
Ramos was offside per the replays.I answered it already. Ramos wasn't offside per the replays. Covered up the pitch (on the Barcola chance).
On the Barcola chance? No, he wasn't.Ramos was offside per the replays.
That pic doesn't show anything *clearly* either on or offThank you for the proof he’s off. Clearly closer to the grass line than Saliba.
You used the wrong D word.Yeah he looks on.
As I said earlier, there's ZERO proof he's off and claiming the chance doesn't count because he's offside is simply dishonest.
You're looking at the wrong guy, it's White (? I think?) on the far side.Thank you for the proof he’s off. Clearly closer to the grass line than Saliba.
Thank you - the still I'd seen only showed Saliba (and Evilo's tweet shows the whole thing having now clicked on it, but was chopped off weirdly). Definitely would have been close and would have been interesting to see the official lines drawnAssuming the grass is completely straight and perpendicular to the field (it isn't always 100%, but it's usually pretty good and we have nothing else to go on), this is what you end up with:
View attachment 1026430
View attachment 1026431
You can't say for sure given the inexactness of the lines on the grass, pixelation, potentially slight fisheye effect on the camera, and the fact that his leading foot is raised, etc, but if anything it looks more on than off.