From the Jets games I saw last year, Wheeler played primarily with Little. Wasn't that the case?
Just seemed inconsistent for OKG to boil the argument down to just points when it is a lot more involved than that IMO.
Scheifele produced like a 2C before he blew up on the Ehlers-Scheifele-Wheeler line, scoring more than 53 percent of his 5v5 points in the less than 39 percent of his ice time that he spent with Wheeler. Additionally five of Scheifele's seven PP goals came in the less than twenty games after Little's injury.
Also Monahan did not play with Gaudreau in Junior. Or as a rookie. Or for a shade over half of his sophomore season. To imply the difference in their entire careers is the result of a single linemate is disingenious.
There is really no rationale upon which to base the claim that Scheifele has been the better player at any age. About all you can claim is that a 22.5 year old Scheifele outperformed a 21 year old Monahan for once. Which is more a testament to a solid dev curve (hard work) than innate talent(natural ability). Monahan was scoring 22 goals as a kid based off talent alone as a 19 year old when his development was behind enough that he should not even have played in the NHL.
Again though, MacKinnon and Barkov are more innately talented than Monahan all the same. Scheifele is the odd man out in that group until he proves do something the other three don't replicate at the same ages. Since he's 2.5 years older than MacKinnon/Barkov and 1.5 years older than Monahan, it is only fair to compare like ages. Do other factors contribute yes they do but those other factors are a wash in this case. Unless you think one way wingers like ROOKIE Joe Colborne (27pts) and Jiri Hudler (45pts) were better linemates than the likes of two way wingers Perrault (40+ pts) and Frolik (40+ pts).
Either way even factoring in time spent prior to this year, Scheifele's career most common 5v5 linemate is... Blake Wheeler.
Not to mention Nikolaj Ehlers in the second half of his rookie season was no chump either.