Celebrini for CALDER

  • We sincerely apologize for the extended downtime. Our hosting provider, XenForo Cloud, encountered a major issue with their backup system, which unfortunately resulted in the loss of some critical data from the past year.

    What This Means for You:

    • If you created an account after March 2024, it no longer exists. You will need to sign up again to access the forum.
    • If you registered before March 2024 but changed your email, username, or password in the past year, those changes were lost. You’ll need to update your account details manually once you're logged in.
    • Threads and posts created within the last year have been restored.
    • Our 2025 light and dark themes were lost, so we are rebuilding them. Light theme is currently available, but work in progress

    Our team is working with Xenforo Cloud to recover data using backups, sitemaps, and other available resources. We know this is frustrating, and we deeply regret the impact on our community. We are taking steps with Xenforo Cloud to ensure this never happens again. This is work in progress. Thank you for your patience and support as we work through this.

    In the meantime, feel free to join our Discord Server
Then again at least half Hutson's points aren't particularly impressive. They are like, decent plays on the PP that one of their shooters buries or sends cross-crease. The team is clicking.

Celebrini on the other hand has to do all the work and is key to almost all the goals he gets points on.
Are you saying that none of those secondary assists were passes that started plays that led to goals? If they were so easy, shouldn’t other d-men on the Canadiens have close to as many? They don’t. Hutson’s IQ on the ice is off the charts.
 
Are you saying that none of those secondary assists were passes that started plays that led to goals? If they were so easy, shouldn’t other d-men on the Canadiens have close to as many? They don’t. Hutson’s IQ on the ice is off the charts.
You have no idea how bad the Sharks are. Hutson has players that can do something with a puck passed to them. The Sharks have literally none.
 
You have no idea how bad the Sharks are. Hutson has players that can do something with a puck passed to them. The Sharks have literally none.
I get that. My point was that if secondary assists were so easy, other d-men on the Canadiens would be closer to Hutson in point totals, but they’re not. Bottom line: they’re both exceptional players.
 
You have no idea how bad the Sharks are. Hutson has players that can do something with a puck passed to them. The Sharks have literally none.
No he doesn't. Aside form the first line and Laine the others would screw up 9 of 10 scoring chances.
It should be close they have similar point totals but Hutson has played more games and of course is older.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan
Sharks will have 10 players score 15 or more points, 5 of them no longer play for the sharks as we speak today.

Montreal will have 17 of them.

Always enjoy the oh the canadiens just have zero depth it is only hutson and every odd game caulfield, suzuki, slaf.
Incredible to see them ignore suzuki's 18pts in 11 games since the 4 Nations break, or Caufield hitting 30, or Slaf finally playing great hockey, etc

No, it's ALL Lane
 
When you look at that and realize Toffoli is literally the best we've got ...

Like he could be in behind the defense and receive a Celebrini dime and it's not even guaranteed he'd get a breakaway.
 
Sharks will have 10 players score 15 or more points, 5 of them no longer play for the sharks as we speak today.

Montreal will have 17 of them.

Always enjoy the oh the canadiens just have zero depth it is only hutson and every odd game caulfield, suzuki, slaf.

My favorite is the "but he wasnt on PP1 till November!!!!" yet they never acknowledge the 12 games played difference
 

Ad

Ad