Sens Vader
Registered User
- Jan 23, 2016
- 7,496
- 5,334
Proposal: Ceci for Trouba
- Thread starter Sens Vader
- Start date
CaptainChef
Registered User
Return of the Jetdi
True North Strong
- Feb 27, 2015
- 24
- 0
To be honest, I wouldn't mind that too much compared to the other trades proposed
Ottawa definitely adds
Ottawa definitely adds
Sens Vader
Registered User
- Jan 23, 2016
- 7,496
- 5,334
I understand that, I guess I was trying to bring up the question CAN the Jets get an equivalent (or somewhat equivalent) left shooting d-man. I dont really know who is available that fits that category, and it seems a deal between the Jets and Ducks cannot get done (my speculation).
So I thought id bring up Ceci for the sake of discussion.
Sens Vader
Registered User
- Jan 23, 2016
- 7,496
- 5,334
CaptainChef
Registered User
Yep, thats the preference. Have no clue who you could add for a + but a young LHD like Chabot would at least get you part way there. Problem is, I don't see too much of interest that could realistically be added.
Neiler
Registered Loser
- Jul 16, 2006
- 2,195
- 786
Ottawa doesn't need a Trouba to play behind Karlsson. Ceci is a great fit.
I thought the reason the whole Trouba thing was happening was because he wanted a bigger role anyhow. Playing behind arguably the best defenceman in the NHL probably isn't ideal.
I thought the reason the whole Trouba thing was happening was because he wanted a bigger role anyhow. Playing behind arguably the best defenceman in the NHL probably isn't ideal.
Assuming Ceci was dealt, he'd still get top 4 minutes and more importantly he'd play his preferred side.
Baby Ryan
Registered User
Trouba wouldn't be getting a lot of PP or even PK time from the looks of it so far.
Probably wouldn't sit well with him.
PetterssonSimp
Registered User
- Dec 12, 2008
- 7,374
- 918
So a team with an internal cap and a cheap owner is gonna spend not only assets but huge cap space and salary on a player to basically swap the one devil they know for the one they don't.
Seems Ceci fits the system, cap structure and role a lot better than Trouba.
Let alone even trying to even the value difference between the two for the Jets. This is just a poorly thought out proposal. No needs of either team were given any thought too.
Seems Ceci fits the system, cap structure and role a lot better than Trouba.
Let alone even trying to even the value difference between the two for the Jets. This is just a poorly thought out proposal. No needs of either team were given any thought too.
From my relatively un-informed and purely a fan point of view, I can imagine Ottawa being interesting in Ceci/Trouba deal, maybe. But I definitely can't imagine Winnipeg moving Trouba in a deal, where Ceci is the main countervalue. Now, I can imagine Winnipeg being relatively interested in a deal made around Chabot, maybe. But I'm not really sure Ottawa would do that. Well, they probably would've already had they wanted.
You could ask Bob McKenzie in his podcast, he could answer what he thinks about Chabot/Trouba idea for example, he would maybe answer that imo. But my opinion is that Chabot is too valuable for Ottawa. The Senators wouldn't give up their best defensive prospect for Trouba imo.
You could ask Bob McKenzie in his podcast, he could answer what he thinks about Chabot/Trouba idea for example, he would maybe answer that imo. But my opinion is that Chabot is too valuable for Ottawa. The Senators wouldn't give up their best defensive prospect for Trouba imo.
internetdotcom
11 + 15 + 19 = 666
Yeah, I don't see a fit here. The Sens like Ceci, he's signed to a good deal, whereas Trouba is an RFA, and Ceci has played well. We traded for Phaneuf to help round out Ceci's game (so he didn't have to carry a revolving door of scrubs that were paired with him before the trade), and to bridge the gap to Chabot becoming a full-time top 4 in the NHL. We'd rather just keep Ceci.
Number1RedWingsFan52
Registered User
Ceci is a RHD not a LHD like Kevin Cheveldayoff is seeking, Winnipeg has no use for Ceci this doesn't work for them. Doubt that Ottawa has what Cheveldayoff would be seeking for Trouba and with what he would be seeking money wise doubt Ottawa would do it.
Am I the only one that would rather have ceci? Long term I think he projects to be better than Trouba, whos decision making is questionable at best a lot of the time..
This is just so false. Trouba is very, very good and GMs around the NHL are salivating at the prospect of acquiring him, based on reports from more than one reporter. Look at Trouba's underlying stats and you can see that he's become a real shutdown D already, and his past shows he has substantial offensive potential if given the usage that he wants.
In any case, Trouba won't want to play in Ottawa any more than in Winnipeg, in my opinion. This is more about him wanting to play in certain types of markets / cities, more than about salary or playing right side D.
Skiffer55
Logan Stanley's Cup
- Jul 4, 2013
- 3,893
- 5,475
He is a year younger so he better develop very quickly to even get close to Trouba. With a year difference he is no looking like he will get there.
Jared Dunn
Registered User
So you knew this, and still came to the conclusion that Ceci fit the description???
I believe is it's because he wont pass Buff anytime soon. In that case, he also won't be passing Karlsson anytime soon
