Line Combos: CBJ Roster Discussion/Line Combos/Injury Report

[majormajor]

This is probably the answer. I’d be reluctant to trade LDBB (a legit center who is developing well) or Elick or Marrelli for a reclamation wing project. Maybe sell high on Pinelli but he might be part a decent of a package offer to help the D or goal tending.

I'd do either Elick or Marelli for Quinn, if they want them. Definitely not LDBB, who is worth too much. Pinelli I don't think is worth much, I think the Sabres might actually be insulted if you suggest him for Quinn.

I’ll take Bjorkstrand back, but I am not offering much. Maybe Brindley. On the pregame last night they were talking about how much better the locker room is now. I don’t want to make a backwards move. I’m not saying OB was the issue, but he didn’t seem to be a solution either. He led the team in scoring but didn’t seem to do much other leading.

Bjorkstrand had the most consistent battle level on the team, pretty much the perfect get pucks deep and win them back player. I'd love it if our young players could learn from him.

Having said that, offering Brindley is a significant offer in my books. Maybe too steep.

 

[koteka]

Bjorkstrand had the most consistent battle level on the team, pretty much the perfect get pucks deep and win them back player. I'd love it if our young players could learn from him.

Having said that, offering Brindley is a significant offer in my books. Maybe too steep.

100% on his compete. But not convinced he is a leader.

Anyway, JD was part of the brain trust that signed him to an extension and then traded him away one year into his contract. I doubt he is re-acquired while JD is here. I doubt JD wants OB around telling young guys who need new contracts that the Jackets will possibly screw them over.

 

[majormajor]

100% on his compete. But not convinced he is a leader.

He is a leader in the sense that he's the guy you follow when the rest of the team isn't playing their game, just do what he does and you'll be good.

Anyway, JD was part of the brain trust that signed him to an extension and then traded him away one year into his contract. I doubt he is re-acquired while JD is here. I doubt JD wants OB around telling young guys who need new contracts that the Jackets will possibly screw them over.

That is quite the yarn. JD isn't in charge and he likely has nothing against bringing Bjorkstrand back.

 

[CannonFire1]

Bjorkstrand has a modified no trade clause (10 team no trade list). I think it is more likely CBJ is on that list than it is those in the front office wouldn't want him back.

 

[majormajor]

Bjorkstrand has a modified no trade clause (10 team no trade list). I think it is more likely CBJ is on that list than it is those in the front office wouldn't want him back.

He said he and his wife were eager to settle down in Columbus and were shocked by the trade. Seattle is doing a stealth long term rebuild so I don't think it's unlikely he'd welcome a trade back.

 

[koteka]

That is quite the yarn. JD isn't in charge and he likely has nothing against bringing Bjorkstrand back.

You always did have way more faith in the competence and actions of the front office than I did. Me, I saw a bunch of bozos on the lookout for themselves. I still see that in JD.

 

[ViD]

Bjork has never hit 60 points in his career and will be 30 next year, this ship has sailed. We need a game breaking talent like Panarin or JG

 

[majormajor]

Bjork has never hit 60 points in his career and will be 30 next year, this ship has sailed. We need a game breaking talent like Panarin or JG

I don't think it's likely that we acquire him, so I hesitate to respond to more Bjorkstrand posts, but suffice it to say that I disagree with the notion that we wouldn't benefit from adding a 59 pt veteran that keeps the puck in the right end of the rink.