He's having that caliber of season but unfortunately Cale Makar exists. Maybe someone will have to Tonya Harding himZach winning the Norris would be sick.
Tampa doesn't have 1st or 3rd rounders this year, so I would decline that offer.What if Tampa offers their 1st through 5th round picks?
this is what OP was referencingTampa doesn't have 1st or 3rd rounders this year, so I would decline that offer.
If they did, and they offered it, that would qualify as overwhelming.
He's having that caliber of season but unfortunately Cale Makar exists. Maybe someone will have to Tonya Harding him
I respectfully disagree. Would rather have Olivier for the next 3-4 years than some later round magic beans that may make the team 4-5 years from now.this is what OP was referencing
imo if they can get something like a 2nd + 4th for him, it's doable. jackets can then turn around and offer similar draft capital to a cap-strapped team for a more impactful forward.
conjuring up a scenario where the jackets get a 2nd for olivier at the deadline, then flip it at the draft to bring back bjorkstrand
i'm not saying i'd rather have olivier than a second round prospect.I respectfully disagree. Would rather have Olivier for the next 3-4 years than some later round magic beans that may make the team 4-5 years from now.
it was a hypothetical.I also think it is highly unlikely that a 2nd round pick would return Bjorkstrand.
i'd argue that the jackets don't get value out of making the picks, but they get a ton of value out of having the picks as it gives them capital to trade and easy levers to pull to improve the roster right now.Extra picks certainly have value and I'm not in the crowd that says CBJ has enough prospects. Just saying I wouldn't trade Olivier for mid to late round picks.
Waddell has been watching closely every aspect of the Blue Jackets organization. He has his coach in place after hiring Dean Evason a month into his Columbus tenure. Now, as his first season unfolds, he’s watching the roster closely, admiring the young talent and trying to figure out which veterans will be part of the mix going forward.
This may take some time, but that’s not because Waddell plans to slow-roll it. To the contrary.
“I like a lot of the young guys,” Waddell said. “We hope they continue to grow. It’s an important year for them to keep maturing, not only as players but as people. If they do that, we’re in pretty good shape for the future.
“Saying that, we’re going to have to add some more pieces next summer; we know that. Going into next summer, we’re going to have lots of cap space. We’re not going to waste it, we’re going to spend it wisely. We’ve already started talking about what areas we need to identify.”
Waddell wasn’t out of work long, but he believes he’s landed well. He’s knee-deep in another project, trying to get the Blue Jackets to achieve the same sustained success as the Hurricanes, but perhaps with more postseason success.
“I was really excited by the opportunity here right from the moment I heard from the Blue Jackets, honestly,” Waddell said. “And it’s been everything I’d hoped and more. The city is great. The fans have been great. The players have played hard almost every night.
“We’ve been through some stuff, some rough patches (on the ice). But I really love it here. It’s been a perfect fit.”
Player A | Player B | Player C | |
Stat line (82-game adjusted) | 17-37–54 | 13-39–52 | 13-47–60 |
Removing PP stats | 12-31–43 | 13-39–52 | 11-35–46 |
Shooting % | 8.5% | 7.3% | 11.9% |
TOI/GP | 18:47 | 18:06 | 18:23 |
I know player B is Roslovic just because I know he’s had no PP pointsjust throwing it out there because it was lost in the KJ/werenski/monahan stuff from last night. there's another forward on this roster who is absolutely flying under the radar right now.
i was curious, so i went ahead and pulled some data for a blind comp.
one of these is a current CBJ forward's pace for this season. the other two are standout seasons from two former CBJ forwards.
Player A Player B Player C Stat line
(82-game adjusted)17-37–54 13-39–52 13-47–60 Removing PP
stats12-31–43 13-39–52 11-35–46 Shooting % 8.5% 7.3% 11.9% TOI/GP 18:47 18:06 18:23
i adjusted each stat line for 82 games. without looking, can anyone guess which is which?
i can confirm that player B is not, in fact, jack roslovic.I know player B is Roslovic just because I know he’s had no PP points
B might be Sillinger? He's the one I'd say has been flying under the radar and I just assume that the stat with no PP points would be related to the under-the-radar player.just throwing it out there because it was lost in the KJ/werenski/monahan stuff from last night. there's another forward on this roster who is absolutely flying under the radar right now.
i was curious, so i went ahead and pulled some data for a blind comp.
one of these is a current CBJ forward's pace for this season. the other two are standout seasons from two former CBJ forwards.
Player A Player B Player C Stat line
(82-game adjusted)17-37–54 13-39–52 13-47–60 Removing PP
stats12-31–43 13-39–52 11-35–46 Shooting % 8.5% 7.3% 11.9% TOI/GP 18:47 18:06 18:23
i adjusted each stat line for 82 games. without looking, can anyone guess which is which?
you got B correct – it is indeed cole sillinger this season.B might be Sillinger? He's the one I'd say has been flying under the radar and I just assume that the stat with no PP points would be related to the under-the-radar player.
The other two... former CBJ forwards, you say? Atkinson comes to mind, since he plays in Tampa? Or is this a centre thing? Maybe Dubois is C and A is Roslovic? Beats me.
EDIT: I said Roslovic because the only other centre of note I can think of is Fedorov. Carter and the words "standout season" I don't think will ever be in the same sentence when describing his time in Columbus.
If it doesn't have to be this season, then I'd guess one of them is Antoine Vermette - probably C. I don't know about the other.you got B correct – it is indeed cole sillinger this season.
- he's being used as a matchup forward and seems to be getting the hardest matchups of any CBJ forward (last night was against kucherov)
- he hasn't exactly been given linemates who light it up (lots of pyyhtia and now olivier) – players A and C had significantly stronger linemates imo
- his stats are more impressive when you factor in the whole "zero power play points" thing
i'd argue that, given that context, sillinger's season (so far obviously) compares extremely favorably to players A and C.
as far as who players A and C could be, i'll tell you that neither of them are roslovic, dubois, atkinson, fedorov or carter. hint: both played center, and both made the playoffs in those seasons.
just throwing it out there because it was lost in the KJ/werenski/monahan stuff from last night. there's another forward on this roster who is absolutely flying under the radar right now.
i was curious, so i went ahead and pulled some data for a blind comp.
one of these is a current CBJ forward's pace for this season. the other two are standout seasons from two former CBJ forwards.
Player A Player B Player C Stat line
(82-game adjusted)17-37–54 13-39–52 13-47–60 Removing PP
stats12-31–43 13-39–52 11-35–46 Shooting % 8.5% 7.3% 11.9% TOI/GP 18:47 18:06 18:23
i adjusted each stat line for 82 games. without looking, can anyone guess which is which?
DING DING DING!EDIT 5: Spoilering it because I looked.
I already guessed Dubinsky and decided I'd gotten it wrong, but then I re-realized the stats were explicitly 82-game adjusted, and so now I suspect his 2013-14 season actually applies. So I was wrong about being wrong? Maybe?
The other, I believe, is 2016-17 Alexander Wennberg.
In reply I offer the following spoilered comments since they're too hinty:DING DING DING!
imo the best season of both those guys' careers. both guys got huge contracts after those seasons, too.
cole sillinger is on pace to have a better season than those two seasons while being younger than both (5+ years younger than Player A was), while playing matchup minutes, having less scoring support, and being on a cheap multi-year contract already.
cannot stress how impressive that is – one could argue that he is already a borderline 2C based on production and context. the eye test doesn't necessarily back that up, but we need to reboot the "cole sillinger is a future 2C" narrative.