Sorry, boo, but I've got the receipts.That’s true, but it wasn’t the first pair, which is what you were worried about.
We got 3/4ths of a season out of him.It's worse, because the picks will be lower, even if just marginally.
It's worse, because the picks will be lower, even if just marginally.
Sorry, boo, but I've got the receipts.
I said he wouldn't be a third pairing D, and he'd be playing with Skjei. You told me:
![]()
Seems one of us is more rational than the other.
That's not a positive value.We got 3/4ths of a season out of him.
That's not a good thing, lolWe got 3/4ths of a season out of him.
We got 3/4ths of a season out of him.
Yeah no you just need to take the L graciously here. SF had it from the start.Context is king.
That's not a positive value.
That's not a good thing, lol
Yeah no you just need to take the L graciously here. SF had it from the start.
Yes the reward of him playing that game really outweighed the risk. of losing these picks.I was told we were gonna get a 2nd rounder...at worst a third. People were all up in arms about him playing against the Devils.....yes, people were freaking about McQuaid.
Jarmo trying his best to make sure he doesn’t even have to show up on draft day
Why was it not a good thing? Did he help us win too many games and mess with our precious 2019 1st round draft pick? No. Did he stick up for team mates when that dip**** McLeod wouldn't? Yes.
I'm not seeing the negative to McQuaid being on roster for 50-60 games.
Agreed. McQuaid is the perfect guy to have on your roster while rebuilding. He isn't a guy I would want in my top-6 as a SC contender but as a 7th defenseman for CBJ? Good idea.Yep. As said, I'd re-sign him for cheap if he would take it. Zero negatives.