Le Grec
Registered User
- Jun 28, 2011
- 3,615
- 1,074
Take out Atkinson
Atkinson Hartnell would be huge upgrade for us. Atkinson is better than his stats and team show. Hartnell is so annoying to play against. Either one could play with JT and Hartnell has a sneaky scoring touch people seem to forget.
How is it an upgrade on any level? Because these players aren't already Islanders and would be shiny and different?
Lol Hartnell for bailey prince and a first? thats funny
Yup, because every player on the Islanders sucks but the exact same or inferior players on other teams are better. But we also should have kept Okposo, Nielsen, and Martin.
Life as an Isles fan...
How is it an upgrade on any level? Because these players aren't already Islanders and would be shiny and different?
But... but... think of how many points [overpaid 32-34 year old winger whose game has regressed in the past couple years] would put up on JT's wing!
Apparently you missed this:
Hartnell + Atkinson had 100+ pts this year, more than double Prince + Bailey.
Double the pts = upgrade.
If a guy regresses down to 110 pts in the past couple years, I'd say he'd probably produce a lot of points on JT's wing.
If a guy regresses down to 110 pts in the past couple years, I'd say he'd probably produce a lot of points on JT's wing.
It's also like double the cap hit and double the age though
Now, I'm not an expert on the NYI players involved, so it's possible I'm off-base. But from here it sure looks like this is an attempt to foist off a high-cap guy whose development is going nowhere and yet another Perpetual "But He Has POTENTIAL" bottom-line winger - you know, two types of assets we have less than zero use for - for two of our top scorers.
Oh, wait, but we also get a (likely late) 1st to try to make up for it.
...
**** that ****.
Pretty much every team in the NHL has a guy like Hartnell, in the same age range, who doesn't come cheap, who the fanbase swears would be super-fantastic on JT's wing and that's why we need to overpay.
Yet they never seem to want Kulemin or Grabovski or entertain how many points they'd put up next to their star players.
Funny, ain't it?
How is it an upgrade on any level? Because these players aren't already Islanders and would be shiny and different?
Uh, what's really funny is that you have no sense of how to compare players. Hartnell's 110 pts is more than Kulemin and Grabovski have done put together in the last two years.
What's really funny is you not realizing my point is mostly that Hartnell is 34 and signed to a sizable cap hit for the next three years, instead of trying to start a pissing contest as to which overpaid veteran puts up the most points.
Asking another team to overpay assets to acquire a 34-year-old with a high cap hit and NMC, ignoring every factor instead to focus on how many points he put up as a 32-year-old, is missing the point entirely. Best of luck getting a juicy, 1st++ return for Hartnell, it sure won't be coming from the Isles.
What's really funny is you not realizing my point is mostly that Hartnell is 34 and signed to a sizable cap hit for the next three years, instead of trying to start a pissing contest as to which overpaid veteran puts up the most points.
Asking another team to overpay assets to acquire a 34-year-old with a high cap hit and NMC, ignoring every factor instead to focus on how many points he put up as a 32-year-old, is missing the point entirely. Best of luck getting a juicy, 1st++ return for Hartnell, it sure won't be coming from the Isles.
Hartnell hasn't broken down yet. Until he does, Columbus shouldn't be giving him away for a broken down price.
The Jackets say "ok he scored 23 goals and 49 points as a top-6 winger. His value is X." The other team says "but he's 34 and has an NMC. His value is Y." And the teams then meet in the middle between X and Y.