Don't repeat the Sam situation. He signed 2 contracts after his ELC.After Sam situation, I don't like bridge deals.
I know, but it could happen again in the future with our other players.Don't repeat the Sam situation. He signed 2 contracts after his ELC.
I wouldn't worry too much about it. If we're a team heading in the right direction they will get signed.I know, but it could happen again in the future with our other players.
I would give Casey something similar to Zacha's 2nd conract.
3 years, $2.25M AAV
Depends on money, I would easily sign Dahlin for 8 years.I really don't feel comfortable signing any our RFAs to 8 year deals.
After Sam situation, I don't like bridge deals.
It'll be in the 8x8 range. I won't be upset but I'm fine waiting.Depends on money, I would easily sign Dahlin for 8 years.
No, of course, a bridge deal is better than five years, but I mean the maximum term.What situation is better? The Sam situation or the Auston Matthews situation. Signing short term deals that keep RFA status to me is better than locking in for 5 and ending up in UFA status anyways.
The 2nd season you list was after training on the taxi squad with Matt Ellis. The questions is can he train adequately in the summer to hold up for a full season?If you give Mittelstadt anything beyond 2 years you are insane. First issue being, 3 years walks him to UFA
Second being....he has 61 points in 155 games. Being a primarily offensive talent, that is concerning. He basically had two seasons last year: First 20 games, 2 G, 4A, -13. last 21 games: 8G, 8A 16P +3. He also shot 20% during that stretch, which is well above his career average.
Realistically, we are looking at a 21 game stretch, basically 1/4 of a NHL season where he's. played well. I've got nearly two seasons of footage where he's played like a guy who isn't a NHL player. 1.5-2M a year, 1-2 year deal, his choice. If i were him I'd take 1 year deal and know you are going to get premium ice time to earn a big contract.
The 2nd season you list was after training on the taxi squad with Matt Ellis. The questions is can he train adequately in the summer to hold up for a full season?
Tell me if I’m wrong but didn’t Sam get bridged twice? Signed a 2 year in 2018 then a 1 year in 2020. The mistake was the 1 year deal and not investing in him long term after his first bridge.After Sam situation, I don't like bridge deals.
Point taken. I'm good with a 1 or 2 year deal.That's why you don't give him a long term contract yet. We need to know.
Yeap, twice, but idiot Botterill could have entered into a long-term contract with him, but decided not to. I mostly talked not about the situation with Mitts, but in general, that contracts should be carefully thought out.Tell me if I’m wrong but didn’t Sam get bridged twice? Signed a 2 year in 2018 then a 1 year in 2020. The mistake was the 1 year deal and not investing in him long term after his first bridge.
You’re correct about two bridge deals.Tell me if I’m wrong but didn’t Sam get bridged twice? Signed a 2 year in 2018 then a 1 year in 2020. The mistake was the 1 year deal and not investing in him long term after his first bridge.
That’s painful to hear again omg what could have beenYou’re correct about two bridge deals.
iirc Botts and Sam’s camp were working on longer term deal (6yrs) but could agree on AAV. I believe Sam’s camp was looking for 5.5 to 6mil per.
I always find this interesting when I think of top 10 pick development. Thomas Vanek didn't make his debut in Buffalo until 22. He was a 3rd line player that could focus on offense.
Mittelstadt is 22 years old and fans pretty much gave up on him before the end of last year.
Mittelstadt didn't take that path. He was a full time NHLer at 19-20 and then went to the AHL after struggling in the NHL at 19-20.Mittelstadt is nothing close to Vanek. He isn't even close to Sam. Vanek dominated college for two season then went to the AHL to dominate there and then went to the NHL. The team had talent ahead of him and knew how to develop prospects properly back then.
Mittelstadt has looked middling in college and the AHL and didn't even look like an NHL player until half of last season.
Mittelstadt didn't take that path. He was a full time NHLer at 19-20 and then went to the AHL.
I didn't say they were the same. I very clearly stated the ages. You proved my point even better by saying Mittelstadt wasn't the same level of prospect. Mittelstadt was obviously in the NHL way too soon. Vanek started at 22 years old, Mittelstadt was labeled a bust at 22, actually before 22.He went to college and did nothing compared to what Vanek did. Same with the AHL. He isn't the same level of prospect or player as Vanek.
I didn't say they were the same. I very clearly stated the ages. You proved my point even better by saying Mittelstadt wasn't the same level of prospect. Mittelstadt was obviously in the NHL way too soon. Vanek started at 22 years old, Mittelstadt was labeled a bust at 21.
No I'm not saying that at all. Lol. It was about developing a prospect. Nothing about what Mittelstadt could become. I'm not even sure how you turned it into that.You're saying just because Vanek did it so Mitts can do it. I'm saying Mitts isn't the same level of prospect or player Vanek was, at any point at the same age and likely won't be.