Confirmed with Link: Carter Hart Officially Charged With One Count Of Sexual Assault (Per His Lawyers); Non-roster, salary cap info in OP

  • Work is still on-going to rebuild the site styling and features. Please report any issues you may experience so we can look into it. Click Here for Updates
Apologies, i know this is probably covered somewhere but there's 54 pages here and I can't be bothered going through it.

Should i just drop Hart in my fantasy league, or is there a chance he comes back?
He ain't playing this season...just drop him
 
  • Like
Reactions: BillDineen
FYI- each of the 5 defence lawyers will get to cross examine the complainant.
Probably is easier on a victim(which obviously is not the term the court would use before any guilt is established) to have 1 trial to testify at instead of 5 different trials.

Certainly easier on the court system.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rebels57
Thanks. Somewhere in a Canadian source I read that the victim of an assault could not be cross examined. Her statement could be challenged in court but that the defense attorneys could not grill her on the stand. It looks like that info could be wrong.

There’s some nuance in the criminal code and applications can be made when there’s a minor or vulnerable adult involved, and I know an accused themselves cannot cross examine. But the info I’ve been fed by my lawyer buddy is the defence lawyers will be able to cross examine. I suppose barring a successful application.
 
  • Like
Reactions: renberg
NJ extended McLeod & Foote the summer before last year (one year of course). Hart & Dube were already signed in previous years on multi-year deals.

I don’t feel bad for the guy but I do agree with you that it was odd.

From the article, he was extended a qualifying offer by the Sens, then rejected the offer, and the Sens never offered another one, so he signed with Switzerland.
 
From the article, he was extended a qualifying offer by the Sens, then rejected the offer, and the Sens never offered another one, so he signed with Switzerland.

I get that but you don’t really hard ball a 22 year old who just put up 30+ points in his first full season with a QO unless…

I don’t feel bad for the guy nor am I throwing shade at Ottawa but it does smell like they used the situation to try & squeeze him at cheaper price. Like I’m sure he would have played that season if he accepted that QO.
 
I get that but you don’t really hard ball a 22 year old who just put up 30+ points in his first full season with a QO unless…

I don’t feel bad for the guy nor am I throwing shade at Ottawa but it does smell like they used the situation to try & squeeze him at cheaper price. Like I’m sure he would have played that season if he accepted that QO.

Yeah, that's certainly possible.

Another option is that they extended the QO because they didn't want to lose him for nothing, but knowing he was involved and likely to be charged, had no interest in offering anything of substance above the QO.
 
  • Like
Reactions: landsbergfan

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad