MOD NOTE:
If you can't post in here without constantly trying to troll each other, you won't be posting in here. Consider this the one and only warning you'll get.
Last edited by a moderator:
And imagine if their backup got hurt too. They’d be nothing.Yeah Vancouver would be totally screwed without Demko in net
They'd probably have to fall back on an unproven AHL rookie.And imagine if their backup got hurt too. They’d be nothing.
You know the answer to this question.If a crosscheck to the face is worthy of a 1-game suspension then why isn't a crosscheck to the face worthy of a 1-game suspension? Bear in mind the only difference is that Hyman went high on purpose
And our top forward was doing his best impression of a ghostAnd imagine if their backup got hurt too. They’d be nothing.
A nothing play turned into a 1 game suspension1 k replies in this thread…
What happened?
Yeah Vancouver would be totally screwed without Demko in net
This. Was expecting 2 as well. Looks like the NHL is starting to get tired of the Oilers playa as well.Expected 2 games, but 1 is reasonable
he cross checked him in the face what was different about it?Lol at exact same play... shows all about the level of understanding... how do you even discuss anything with such mentality
With 7 high danger chances at 5on5? That’s also alarming. Edmonton was completely outclassed in their barn last nightI wonder if that has anything to do with being outshot 45-15 lmfao.
That's 98-point pace, certainly not worthy of a division crown, but I bet most Canucks fans would be happy knowing they get a wildcard spots with a backup goalie + rookie for the whole season.You think they'd make the playoffs in a full season without him in net? They were 15-9-7 without him this year.
You really thought you had the dunk without doing the mathYou think they'd make the playoffs in a full season without him in net? They were 15-9-7 without him this year.
2-9-1 with McDavid hurt to start the year, do them now!You really thought you had the dunk without doing the math
40-23-19 is good for 99 points which literally beats Vegas for a playoff spot lmfao
You really thought you had the dunk without doing the math
40-23-19 is good for 99 points which literally beats Vegas for a playoff spot lmfao
Nah your question was, "You think they'd make the playoffs in a full season without him in net? They were 15-9-7 without him this year."Sure, and then remove Hughes from the equation as well, which is what the original argument was (2 best players). That's not a playoff team.
I mean Canucks without Demko and Hughes likely beat Oilers without McDavid and Drai and I don't even know if that's close at all. Those two are so important for the Oilers (as evidenced by their almost 30 minutes of ice time the last few games). We'd still have Miller & Boeser in addition to the weird synergy Garland, Joshua and Lindholm have going on too.Sure, and then remove Hughes from the equation as well, which is what the original argument was (2 best players). That's not a playoff team.
You really thought you had the dunk without doing the math
40-23-19 is good for 99 points which literally beats Vegas for a playoff spot lmfao