LeBrun frames it as insurance for Kochetkov. Mentions Vladar, Forsberg and Vejmelka as other potential options.
Haha. Why exactly do we need to sell low on Gibson?Anaheim has got to be the stupidest team on planet Earth. The idiocy of that franchise just continues to astound me.
Haha. Why exactly do we need to sell low on Gibson?
cause hes not that good. avalanche moved on cause the price is too high. not many teams left that need goal tending upgrade.Haha. Why exactly do we need to sell low on Gibson?
Hey I think you’re just saying that because you guys got Blackwood instead !Less about selling low and more about pricing yourselves out of selling him at all. Gambling that he's worth more to the right buyer, but if every buyer finds another seller, what's the point?
We don’t need to move him so any interested party has to make it worth our while. Particularly if they expect us to pay for him to play for them. That’s the pointLess about selling low and more about pricing yourselves out of selling him at all. Gambling that he's worth more to the right buyer, but if every buyer finds another seller, what's the point?
Hey I think you’re just saying that because you guys got Blackwood instead !
He’s perfectly fine as Dostal’s backup if nothing elsecause hes not that good. avalanche moved on cause the price is too high. not many teams left that need goal tending upgrade.
Less about selling low and more about pricing yourselves out of selling him at all. Gambling that he's worth more to the right buyer, but if every buyer finds another seller, what's the point?
I agree with this but also the Canes are like so many teams with more prospects than spots, take a chance one in a while eh.Less about selling low and more about pricing yourselves out of selling him at all. Gambling that he's worth more to the right buyer, but if every buyer finds another seller, what's the point?
How would trading Gibson make the Ducks worse keeping in mind his achievements the past half-decade?Otherwise helping the other team fill a need, probably making their own bad team worse...for what?
They need him to some degree.Less about selling low and more about pricing yourselves out of selling him at all. Gambling that he's worth more to the right buyer, but if every buyer finds another seller, what's the point?
Sell low? Last night wasn't great but with with how Gibson started the season I would think that Anaheim would try to trade him as fast as possible fearing he'd turn back into the goalie we've seen the last 5 seasons.Haha. Why exactly do we need to sell low on Gibson?
How would trading Gibson make the Ducks worse keeping in mind his achievements the past half-decade?
Anything that doesn't involve ad hominems?I know you're here because your Gibson google alert went off telling you to come make the same post ten times in this thread like usual (seriously your obsession is downright bizarre, it's 20% of your posting on this site on one player who's team you don't follow, dude should consider a restraining order). An ounce of logic suggests that the Ducks aren't receiving a better goalie in return unless the other team is brain-dead.
Anything that doesn't involve ad hominems?
You bump these threads to make the same posts even when no one has responded, it's truly a bizarre fixation to have with a random player around the league.
If a quality org like Carolina is even showing interest, that should tell you that your rock bottom opinion might be skewed.
Why is he there if he is going to be miserable?Haha. Why exactly do we need to sell low on Gibson?