Kojo
Registered User
- Nov 22, 2013
- 5,983
- 2,439
Any chance he will make a surprise come back when the Habs become a playoff team? He's only 36 years old.
He needs quality of life. The toll his knees have taken are crazy I would love it but it wouldn't be worth itAny chance he will make a surprise come back when the Habs become a playoff team? He's only 36 years old.
There is zero percent chance he comes back to play. I posted this earlier in the thread and explains how his femur no longer has any cartilage.Any chance he will make a surprise come back when the Habs become a playoff team? He's only 36 years old.
There is zero percent chance he comes back to play. I posted this earlier in the thread and explains how his femur no longer has any cartilage.
He gave us 8 years of elite goaltending being paid at a bargain before Bergevin gave him a retirement cheque. And he still took us further on that crippling contract everyone complained about then a lot of stars in this league have taken their teams in 2021.How come ? He’s been paid like a superstar for is entire tenure here .. and still is . He might no got all the love on these boards. Who gives a shyt.
He got all the love, respect. And money from the org. He can no chill for the rest of life . I think he received a lot from the CH.
In retrospect, he was easily the 3rd best player of his generation after Crosby and Ovechkin, but this was cloaked behind the circumstances. Price was a towering goalie just as good as Dryden.
We might not see another one like him for decades.
If you think Malkin or Kane tilts the ice as much as Price, you are crazy, insane.
Maybe Getzlaf or Toews at their peak. Otherwise, for his overall body of work, playing the most pressure position in hockey; goalie in MTL, Price was King.
(I don't consider Pronger from the same generation).
I feel it would be helpful to talk about actual statistical and tactical impact of a player on the game; I find listing cup winners somewhat anecdotal. 4 of the last 10 had won the president trophy so worse than a coin flip for starters.easily 3rd best player in the league? Woah thats your opinion and I couldnt disagree more with you. When you look at the goalies that won the cup during his era , you can easily see that a goaltender doesnt tilt the ice like you think. Many teams won with pretty average goaltender.
The goaltending position in the new NHL is so overated by our fan base. I explain that with of our rich history in that position Dryden, Roy, Plante. Fortunately the new management group seem to knows that you dont put too much stock on your goaltending position and more in building a great team on the ice. Monty and Primeau can win you a cup, with the right team in front of them
I feel it would be helpful to talk about actual statistical and tactical impact of a player on the game; I find listing cup winners somewhat anecdotal. 4 of the last 10 had won the president trophy so worse than a coin flip for starters.
Carey was also their best puck moving defenseman some seasons as well (barely kidding here) and the crap teams in front of him would go from record breaking streaks to record breaking suck whenever he got injured.
I’d be curious about win over replacement in his prime, not sure how well tracked that would be (not like today for sure).
He was the best statistical goaltender from 2010-2017. Save percentage around .930 during that stretch as well. That’s not a small sample size. He was in the league too young at 20 and given to big of a role to quick and the injuries piled up at the end of his career. But he was never a middle of the packed guy and definitely never regarded as such.If you only look at statistics except for 2-3 seasons, Carey had pretty average statistics for a goaltender. Hes was a middle of the pack guy for the most part of his career. So 3rd best player, during his era which span for what 12 seasons, in the league is just a fallacy
100% this. Unlike other goalies, Price was our best player. Not much support year in year out. You can’t say that about many goaliesHe was the best statistical goaltender from 2010-2017. Save percentage around .930 during that stretch as well. That’s not a small sample size. He was in the league too young at 20 and given to big of a role to quick and the injuries piled up at the end of his career. But he was never a middle of the packed guy and definitely never regarded as such.
the fact that he pretty much had the single greatest statistical Team Canada Olympics run (.6 GAA .972 S%) shows how good he would've been with teams like Roy and Brodeur had in front of them in the NHL.If you only look at statistics except for 2-3 seasons, Carey had pretty average statistics for a goaltender. Hes was a middle of the pack guy for the most part of his career. So 3rd best player, during his era which span for what 12 seasons, in the league is just a fallacy
You are making very black and white comments with “can easily see…”. and “it’s the opposite”, I don’t find that super useful beyond sparking more hot takes.If you only look at statistics except for 2-3 seasons, Carey had pretty average statistics for a goaltender. Hes was a middle of the pack guy for the most part of his career. So 3rd best player, during his era which span for what 12 seasons, in the league is just a fallacy.
The other poster saind Price was underated , I think completely the opposite. IMO he was one of the most overated player in our team during his era. His contract is as bad as the Gallagher one
the fact that he pretty much had the single greatest statistical Team Canada Olympics run (.6 GAA .972 S%) shows how good he would've been with teams like Roy and Brodeur had in front of them in the NHL.
his stats were middle of the pack in the NHL because he dragged bottom-barrel teams into relevance.
You are making very black and white comments with “can easily see…”. and “it’s the opposite”, I don’t find that super useful beyond sparking more hot takes.
Goalie stats behind the teams he played will be affected for sure. I heard he was not a great goalie because he could not win cups his whole career, which to me is silly. I agree with the poster above when talking about a good portion of fans and media (who loved to spark that as a black/white debate because habs sell).
It’s why I’d be interested about his impact on the team by modern metrics.
edit - I obviously agree his contract is horrendous
There is zero percent chance he comes back to play. I posted this earlier in the thread and explains how his femur no longer has any cartilage.
If you go back and look at player polls, Price was always the goalie other teams regarded as the best. Even during his "mediocre" seasons, he managed to be the guy that shooters least likely wanted to face. His last playoff run, with everything we know now, should be a good indicator as to how he was able to impact a team.If you only look at statistics except for 2-3 seasons, Carey had pretty average statistics for a goaltender. Hes was a middle of the pack guy for the most part of his career. So 3rd best player, during his era which span for what 12 seasons, in the league is just a fallacy.
The other poster saind Price was underated , I think completely the opposite. IMO he was one of the most overated player in our team during his era. His contract is as bad as the Gallagher one
Cheers I wouldn’t be opposed to maybe a bust instead of one of those epic full body Maurice statues thoughYou are right its not black and white. Price was dominant for a few seasons nobody can deny that. The only point that tick me off was the same rhetoric we heard for many seasons. If we won the game it was because of Price and his miraculous saves and if we lost the games it was the team in front of him fault.
I will never expect a player to tilt the ices in a such a way that he can turn a losing team into a contender. You need many pieces in order to have sucess as a NHL team. I just think in todays era with goaltenders having similar built , similar technique , similar training. The position became very robotic like. Hence why I think in building a winning NHL team, the goaltending position should really be the last of your concern. I feel with Monty and Primeau we have a capable duo for half the salary of Price. The money saved can be used for better forward or defensemen who in my book actually have a chance to tilt the game in our favor
The other poster said he was underated which is kind of comical. He won every Molson cups there was to win while he was playing. He got the biggest contract in the club history (didnt even show up for a press conference) , he was the media darling and a fan favorite. How is that underated?
What more does he need? His jersey retired , a statue in front of the bell center?
Yet when he was injured in 2015-2016 the team went from top 3 in the league to bottom 10. His career saves % is 917. It puts him 9th since 1993-1994 among goalies with 400+ games. He is 4th since 1993-1994 among goalies with 600 games played behind Hasek, Luongo and Lundqvist. He led an average lineup to a stanley cup final, won the Calder dup in the AHL (MVP), won the gold medal at the u20. gold medal at world cup, gold medal at olympic game. won the hart and vezina trophy.If you only look at statistics except for 2-3 seasons, Carey had pretty average statistics for a goaltender. Hes was a middle of the pack guy for the most part of his career. So 3rd best player, during his era which span for what 12 seasons, in the league is just a fallacy.
The other poster saind Price was underated , I think completely the opposite. IMO he was one of the most overated player in our team during his era. His contract is as bad as the Gallagher one
We could never ever score for him...............that's it.You are right its not black and white. Price was dominant for a few seasons nobody can deny that. The only point that tick me off was the same rhetoric we heard for many seasons. If we won the game it was because of Price and his miraculous saves and if we lost the games it was the team in front of him fault.
I will never expect a player to tilt the ices in a such a way that he can turn a losing team into a contender. You need many pieces in order to have sucess as a NHL team. I just think in todays era with goaltenders having similar built , similar technique , similar training. The position became very robotic like. Hence why I think in building a winning NHL team, the goaltending position should really be the last of your concern. I feel with Monty and Primeau we have a capable duo for half the salary of Price. The money saved can be used for better forward or defensemen who in my book actually have a chance to tilt the game in our favor
The other poster said he was underated which is kind of comical. He won every Molson cups there was to win while he was playing. He got the biggest contract in the club history (didnt even show up for a press conference) , he was the media darling and a fan favorite. How is that underated?
What more does he need? His jersey retired , a statue in front of the bell center?
Price was an auto-win if we scored three or more. He consistently won playoff series we should've lost against better teams. That's not easy to do.easily 3rd best player in the league? Woah thats your opinion and I couldnt disagree more with you. When you look at the goalies that won the cup during his era , you can easily see that a goaltender doesnt tilt the ice like you think. Many teams won with pretty average goaltender.
The goaltending position in the new NHL is so overated by our fan base. I explain that with of our rich history in that position Dryden, Roy, Plante. Fortunately the new management group seem to knows that you dont put too much stock on your goaltending position and more in building a great team on the ice. Monty and Primeau can win you a cup, with the right team in front of them
His contract has been pretty meaningless.You are making very black and white comments with “can easily see…”. and “it’s the opposite”, I don’t find that super useful beyond sparking more hot takes.
Goalie stats behind the teams he played will be affected for sure. I heard he was not a great goalie because he could not win cups his whole career, which to me is silly. I agree with the poster above when talking about a good portion of fans and media (who loved to spark that as a black/white debate because habs sell).
It’s why I’d be interested about his impact on the team by modern metrics.
edit - I obviously agree his contract is horrendous
From 2014 to 17 he was arguably the best player in the league. Tragic that 2016 he got hurt while being 10-2 as that probably would've been back to back Hart trophies.I don't think it's at all ridiculous to put his peak impact on the game at a similar level of Crosby or OV.
If you take Price off and add one of those guys I'm not sure the Habs would have done any better.
Carey Price was just a much better goaltender than his contemporaries. You can't look at the impact of regular goaltenders and say "goaltenders don't have an impact". Carey Price is as special as they get as hockey players.easily 3rd best player in the league? Woah thats your opinion and I couldnt disagree more with you. When you look at the goalies that won the cup during his era , you can easily see that a goaltender doesnt tilt the ice like you think. Many teams won with pretty average goaltender.
The goaltending position in the new NHL is so overated by our fan base. I explain that with of our rich history in that position Dryden, Roy, Plante. Fortunately the new management group seem to knows that you dont put too much stock on your goaltending position and more in building a great team on the ice. Monty and Primeau can win you a cup, with the right team in front of them