Fair enough — I’m actually an energy markets quant, and I interview candidates for other quant positions. It’s just disappointing (sometimes infuriating) when someone claims to have accomplished X and, it turns out, only managed someone who did (for example) or that they have hands on experience with stochastic calculus … 10 years earlier. Funny enough, I had a guy walk out mid interview, saying “this isn’t a good fit” after I caught him lying about his knowledge of options markets: you need to know more than the definition of an option to make such a claim.
I feel like this is where quant positions are different than the arithmetic business positions, lol. In a job where you add, subtract, and multiply for a living as an analyst managing someone who has added, subtracted, and multiplied is considered a bigger achievement and someone further along in his/her career than actually doing the adding, subtracting, and multiplying.