Kazer
Registered User
I don't think you get to say you're basing it on actual performance and then discount almost half his actual performance (29 vs 24).Strome, just working on his 3rd straight career season here with us.
I’m confident CMM’s initial 24 games were an aberration until he proves he can do it over sustained multiple seasons. For now though, I’d be happy if he got back to a 60 point pace instead of the 39 point pace he’s now been on for the majority of the season.
Zero group think, it’s called actual analysis.
One side of this debate is going on actual performance, the other, on hopes, dreams, and prayers….
If you're asking me who McMichael is (first half or second half), I agree with you that he's probably closer to a 40 point player than an 80 point player, but I don't think the first half can be dismissed as an aberration. He's a talented player who got hot, but he's prone to cold streaks. That's VERY common amongst NHL players who aren't superstars. Protas had a stretch last year where he scored 3 goals and 11 points over 45 games last season while averaging over 14 minutes per game.
If you can find a hockey trade a la Necas for Rantanen (adjusted a bit down since Necas > McMichael), I'm all aboard. But otherwise, I'm hanging onto a very good middle-six winger who can play PP, PK, and contribute at even strength.