- May 20, 2015
- 490
- 223
I think that was more a situation of not paying a higher percent of the cap on him over MacKinnon.Colorado could've kept Rantanen easily after all. lmao.
I think that was more a situation of not paying a higher percent of the cap on him over MacKinnon.Colorado could've kept Rantanen easily after all. lmao.
They have to pay Makar in two years. That will be a heavy tab.I think that was more a situation of not paying a higher percent of the cap on him over MacKinnon.
It could be the same with us and Ovie.I think that was more a situation of not paying a higher percent of the cap on him over MacKinnon.
This is a fair point. Sell high on this guy in the offseason.Just wait until inflation hits and McMichael is making ~$9M.
Is the rumored $14-$14.5 million on a $95.5 million cap really a higher percentage than MacKinnons when he signed though?I think that was more a situation of not paying a higher percent of the cap on him over MacKinnon.
He’s signed for 2 more after this season. 29 when he starts the new contract. Will be interesting to follow.They have to pay Makar in two years. That will be a heavy tab.
Caps should give Rantanen or Marner $15M ...
I think the most interesting thing in all of this is that right now almost every team is capped out. How many are going to have owners willing to go to the new ceiling? I'd lean towards Ted being one of those owners. He was willing to dip into the luxury tax for an awful to mediocre Wizards team for years.
I'm sure Rantanen's agent knew the Cap was going up this much when he made his demands. Its also just possible Rantanen didn't want to stay in Colorado at any price.Colorado could've kept Rantanen easily after all. lmao.
I think 10 million on goaltending is in fact, insane but let’s see what happens. If they pay him 4 AAV, that is a mistake. Seems like a great dude but he isn’t going to be the starter moving forward.
I do too and there is no way in hell he gets 4 AAV.For several years, Caps fans complained about the FO cheaping out on minimum wage goalies and suffering the results. Now today we are leading the entire NHL in team GAA, and people want to cheap out on the backup goalie, and go back to what, another minimum wage guy? For what its worth, Charlie's GAA with the Caps had dropped from 3.05 to 2.67 to 2.61 in his three seasons here.
$4M may be a bit high, but he's earned and deserves a decent, not minimum wage contract. And we need a quality backup goalie. I trust the FO to get it right.
Was he playing that poorly down in Hershey? Do they have some of these prospects coming to take his place? Need to free money for another move? Roster limits?
Genuinely interested about this. Seems random.
Just added him to the last prospect poll so that figures.I assume it's mutual so he can go play overseas.
Conveniently, it gives the Caps an extra contract slot. Less conveniently, the Caps have no LD depth in the organization.
Yeah that sounds like as good a reason as any. Just odd/random timing. As you say, takes away our LD depth prior to the playoffs - so surprised we agreed.I assume it's mutual so he can go play overseas.
Conveniently, it gives the Caps an extra contract slot. Less conveniently, the Caps have no LD depth in the organization.
Not sure, but me and math aren't the best of friendsIs the rumored $14-$14.5 million on a $95.5 million cap really a higher percentage than MacKinnons when he signed though?
Yeah that sounds like as good a reason as any. Just odd/random timing. As you say, takes away our LD depth prior to the playoffs - so surprised we agreed.
As if Protas’s contract wasn’t good enough already. Strome and Sandin’s contract extensions also looking even better and PLD will be close to getting paid 2nd line money in 3 years.
Thompson’s contract also looks better now. If he continues to play at a starter level the next 3 years (not even the Vezina candidate he’s been this year), his cap% in 27-28 will be equivalent to a 4.55mil cap hit this year.
They’re in a really, really good spot right now with some young talent on the way and a lot of money available. I’d still be wary of overpaying guys like Dowd and Lindgren though. Spend the extra money at the top of the lineup and sign depth players (like Raddysh, Duhaime, or the original Lindgren and Dowd contracts) that are similarly effective but might not be as heralded.
Mackinnnon signed 12.6M starting when the cap was 83.5M, so 12.6/83.5 = 15.09% of the cap.Is the rumored $14-$14.5 million on a $95.5 million cap really a higher percentage than MacKinnons when he signed though?
Yea, the weekend of the trade, Friedman was talking about this. Some teams will have an internal cap, and won’t touch 100M. He suggested that the Avs were one of those teams, and were hiding behind the “can’t pay a winger more than MacK or as much as centers like Draisaitl.”Caps should give Rantanen or Marner $15M ...
I think the most interesting thing in all of this is that right now almost every team is capped out. How many are going to have owners willing to go to the new ceiling? I'd lean towards Ted being one of those owners. He was willing to dip into the luxury tax for an awful to mediocre Wizards team for years.