Devil Dancer
Registered User
- Jan 21, 2006
- 18,585
- 5,794
I think that's the first time I've ever seen someone claim the NHL rigged the Ovie draft.
Speculation: Caps General Discussion (Coaching/FAs/Cap/Lines etc) - 2021 Off-Season Pt. 1
- Thread starter Calicaps
- Start date
- Status
Ovechkins Wodka
Registered User
John Price
Gang Gang
- Sep 19, 2008
- 384,438
- 30,319
txpd
Registered User
Ok...I'll bite. Why would the NHL fix the lottery for the Capitals? Particularly since they went so out of their way to screw them in the next draft?
Langway
In den Wolken
- Jul 7, 2006
- 32,929
- 10,072
Is this the NHL's summer of the blockbuster? Here are 5 stars who could be traded
Some Kuznetsov talk.
Some Kuznetsov talk.
txpd
Registered User
following the link to the Kempny story and finding a top 4 job is his to lose was my laugh of the day
txpd
Registered User
What does it say? Is it any more than pointing out there is trouble in paradise or are they more specific about where he might go and what might be returned?
twabby
Registered User
- Mar 9, 2010
- 14,107
- 15,553
Speculated that Vegas could be a potential destination, especially if they lose out on Eichel:
@AlexBrovechkin8 @Calicaps @hockeykicker edit this quote if it's too long. I'm not really sure what we're allowed to quote in a paywalled article.
Last edited by a moderator:
txpd
Registered User
Thanks Twabs. Thats about what I was thinking. They were throwing around those terms inconsistent and returning to form and divisive. Are you sure those are either not true or irrelevant? I also agree that they wont trade him unless they just cant go forward with him.
They are also reporting McMichael as not ready.
Lastly: The Vegas idea is interesting but with his off ice issues, I wonder if that is really the environment that would be good for him. Anaheim might be a better choice. Good quality of life.
Langway
In den Wolken
- Jul 7, 2006
- 32,929
- 10,072
I don't know if I buy that there are so many options to replace him but if he has to go then he has to go. Cap space has value but in itself I'm not sure it's enough value coming back unless he's believed to be addition by subtraction. Maybe so. It's convenient enough to make 92 the next to be voted off the island but a more comprehensive and critical approach is likely needed. Not that he isn't a fundamental problem but I'd still hesitate to rush into concluding getting rid of him for whatever is a brilliant move and that cap space is enough.
The only free agent center that could maybe do a reasonable job offensively is Krejci and who knows if he's even considering leaving Boston at this stage. I doubt it. Danault is strong defensively but I don't know how well that would translate. Stopgaps might make them a transitional team. Maybe that's unavoidable due to the cap but if so it come across as pretty muddled. They need to avoid the muddled, mushy middle of mediocrity.
The only free agent center that could maybe do a reasonable job offensively is Krejci and who knows if he's even considering leaving Boston at this stage. I doubt it. Danault is strong defensively but I don't know how well that would translate. Stopgaps might make them a transitional team. Maybe that's unavoidable due to the cap but if so it come across as pretty muddled. They need to avoid the muddled, mushy middle of mediocrity.
Last edited:
Hivemind
We're Touched
The trade paralysis of the finals and pre-expansion draft feels like forever.
txpd
Registered User
txpd
Registered User
I saw them mention to viable options Vegas and the Ducks. The others have to be on his no trade list. I think that the only way they trade him is if the relationship with the players(primarily the core players) is broken beyond repair. I think if they will accept him that MacLellan will suck it up and hope for the best.
I just dont expect anything on this front to happen. Its now just something to talk about in the off season. That said MacLellan always seems to do what he needs to do.
I am thinking the big off season move is going to be finding a team for Kempny
CapitalsCupReality
It’s Go Time!!
- Feb 27, 2002
- 66,226
- 21,212
Yep, as predicted, we might be screwed and be forced to keep this “flake” and his “divisive presence”…
Pretty damning comments and unnamed quotes.
Pretty damning comments and unnamed quotes.
Langway
In den Wolken
- Jul 7, 2006
- 32,929
- 10,072
Moving Kempny is small potatoes. It needs to happen but it's more perfunctory than impactful.
VGK/ANA may be prime players for Eichel so you'd think that needs to happen first. Given some of the recent reports on BUF's ask maybe that doesn't even happen until after the expansion draft at the entry draft. The one bit of leverage here for Washington may be threatening to leave Kuznetsov unprotected for Seattle in the hopes he waives for a better, more competitive team. Who knows if it'd work but if the relationship is toxic then hoping Seattle takes him off their hands can't be ruled out.
VGK/ANA may be prime players for Eichel so you'd think that needs to happen first. Given some of the recent reports on BUF's ask maybe that doesn't even happen until after the expansion draft at the entry draft. The one bit of leverage here for Washington may be threatening to leave Kuznetsov unprotected for Seattle in the hopes he waives for a better, more competitive team. Who knows if it'd work but if the relationship is toxic then hoping Seattle takes him off their hands can't be ruled out.
BiPolar Caps
Registered User
twabby
Registered User
- Mar 9, 2010
- 14,107
- 15,553
Really dislike the idea of adding Krejci. There's a reason Boston traded for Hall and that's because the second line, including Krejci, wasn't getting it done offensively. I'm not sure what he really adds to DC. Same with Danault, who is a strong defensive player but just cannot score or create offense.
Not a free agent but I'd like to see them take a hard run at Hertl. The cap hit is more than reasonable at $5.625M, he drives play with the best of them, he scores at 5v5, he's strong defensively, he's been very good in the postseason, and for those who care he's 53% at the dot for his career. He's also a lefty so he could fit in on the PP either below the goal-line or at the half-wall.
I'm not sure exactly how available he is in a trade but I'd at least take a good look at him and wouldn't be afraid to part with significant assets if that's what it takes, especially if they can agree to a contract extension. He's the type of player the Capitals need to replace Kuznetsov. If he's not available in the offseason I'd like them to at least keep their eyes on him going into the season and at the TDL if the Sharks aren't competing for a playoff spot and Hertl doesn't re-sign with them. He only has a 3-team trade list so he'd likely have to waive but I think it's possible that he'd consider waiving for Washington.
Ovechkins Wodka
Registered User
?
Oh you meant the Ovie draft was rigged? We won the fair, it was the lockout draft that was rigged to hurt the Caps.
txpd
Registered User
I’m in agreement that Krecji isn’t the guy (unless it’s a 1-2 year deal) but I’m not against Krecji for the same reason(s) you are. Krecji was a beast this year and made part of a nice second line with Craig Smith but DeBrusk fell off a cliff and no one could fill that other wing. Krecji is also slower than Kuz and I don’t want to be relying on two 34-year old slow-of-foot centers as our top two guys when the league is getting younger and faster. I’m also hesitant to grab Krecji because he wouldn’t be utilized on the PP which is one of his strengths. If they lose Kuznetsov then Mantha is the obvious replacement but the PP would have to be changed completely in order for Krecji to be effective and while that might be necessary, it’s not happening if Ovi plays 1:40 of every 2:00 penalty.
That said, this team is definitely stronger defensively if they get Krecji and they lose their worst faceoff guy in exchange for a strong faceoff guy by swapping Kuz for Krecji.
And your snippet from The Athletic is good — quoting a piece of an article behind a paywall is fine as long as you’re not quoting a large portion of the article.
Langway
In den Wolken
- Jul 7, 2006
- 32,929
- 10,072
Dream on re: Hertl. The Caps are largely asset poor, which is why dumping Kuznetsov hurts. They already took a relatively big swing on Mantha. Hard to see them realistically moving McMichael+ for a center replacement. It's just burning through assets and draining the future. The sort of hockey deals you want they're probably not even entertaining.
They could conceivably put 92's money to better use but I don't know how many needle movers there are to be had on the cheap. Even with all of the names floated the vast majority fall short of being core performers to the level needed going forward. I wouldn't hate bringing Schmidt back for the added pace/athleticism but it's not enough bigger picture. Hamilton could make for a decent 1/2 RD punch but will require lots of term and his tenacity is questionable. The centers in UFA are stopgaps. A lot of the more prominent UFA wingers probably re-sign but even if they don't I wouldn't expect MacLellan to sign one only to ship another out. Modestly reliable and more stable pieces could be a net plus but they're at a super tricky stage.
Even Krejci, IMO the best UFA center of the bunch, probably doesn't cut it. They're in a situation where they need to think more comprehensively and honestly about where they are and I'm not sure they're operating from that vantage point. They seem much more likely to continue to force things and sort of pin their mismanagement on their obligation to remain competitive with 8/19. When the real problem is that organizationally they need to raise their game as those two players become less impactful. Lately the results suggest they're not up for that so my expectations this summer are fairly low. A conventional off-season for them probably puts them too close to the pack for comfort. Not to say they need to move a Carlson or Wilson and do something massive. I don't expect it. But they need to be more flexible in their approach and more honest about what they have, where they're at and their ability to maximize everything at their disposal.
They could conceivably put 92's money to better use but I don't know how many needle movers there are to be had on the cheap. Even with all of the names floated the vast majority fall short of being core performers to the level needed going forward. I wouldn't hate bringing Schmidt back for the added pace/athleticism but it's not enough bigger picture. Hamilton could make for a decent 1/2 RD punch but will require lots of term and his tenacity is questionable. The centers in UFA are stopgaps. A lot of the more prominent UFA wingers probably re-sign but even if they don't I wouldn't expect MacLellan to sign one only to ship another out. Modestly reliable and more stable pieces could be a net plus but they're at a super tricky stage.
Even Krejci, IMO the best UFA center of the bunch, probably doesn't cut it. They're in a situation where they need to think more comprehensively and honestly about where they are and I'm not sure they're operating from that vantage point. They seem much more likely to continue to force things and sort of pin their mismanagement on their obligation to remain competitive with 8/19. When the real problem is that organizationally they need to raise their game as those two players become less impactful. Lately the results suggest they're not up for that so my expectations this summer are fairly low. A conventional off-season for them probably puts them too close to the pack for comfort. Not to say they need to move a Carlson or Wilson and do something massive. I don't expect it. But they need to be more flexible in their approach and more honest about what they have, where they're at and their ability to maximize everything at their disposal.
OV Rocks
Registered User
Soooo, Nate Schmidt? I want him back, probably can get him at a good price.
Schmidt-Carlson
Orlov-TVR
Fehervary-Jensen
Works for me
Dillion for Schmidt
Schultz+ sweetener to Seattle
Schmidt-Carlson
Orlov-TVR
Fehervary-Jensen
Works for me
Dillion for Schmidt
Schultz+ sweetener to Seattle
JohnCarlsaurus
ALL SYSTEMS NOMINAL
Vancouver's GM did say he wanted to add more muscle on the backend... Schmidt has regressed a bit and we'd also be adding salary + term but it would still be an upgrade
twabby
Registered User
- Mar 9, 2010
- 14,107
- 15,553
I agree they are unlikely to part with someone like McMichael to make a deal happen but I think they need to consider it. I'd like to see them compete for another Cup now, even if it means mortgaging the post-Ovechkin future a bit. I just don't see this as a roster as it currently stands that can get the job done, especially at center. Again, even if healthy what are we realistically expecting out of Ovechkin, Backstrom, Oshie, Kuznetsov, and Carlson next season? They need more help, and while I like the Mantha addition he's probably more of a marginal upgrade than anything.
The question to me becomes how does McMichael fit into any sort of contention window? He's likely a few years away from contributing in a top 6 role, at which point Ovechkin and Backstrom will likely be unable to be big contributors at even strength and they'll be eating up a huge portion of the cap. So when McMichael is in his prime at 23-27 years old what does the team even look like then? Are they likely to be contenders? Hard to make that case IMO with the prospect pool as barren as it is and with their vets eating up so much of the cap. McMichael is likely going to have his best years when the team around him is going to be at their worst. Is there really any purpose to wasting your best prospect's prime around an aging cap-strapped roster, or would his value be better cashed in now to get an impact player that can legitimately help make the team contend now?
They need to contend this year and next year IMO, and I don't think they can do that without a better 1C than Kuznetsov or Backstrom. I don't disagree with your points about them needing to be honest about what they are but in that case they really have two options: sell everyone except 8 and 19 and begin the rebuild now or go all-in. A do-nothing summer is the worst of both worlds IMO, where they aren't legitimately going for another Cup now while also not doing what they can to position themselves for a Cup in the future. Just spinning their wheels and hoping to luck their way into a deep run (if they even make the postseason) seems foolish.
Personally I'm all for cashing in futures now, including McMichael if necessary, in order to get a few more runs at glory with 8 and 19 and then starting a painful rebuild after that.
twabby
Registered User
- Mar 9, 2010
- 14,107
- 15,553
I guess I'm just not seeing defense as the main issue with Washington (paradoxically, given their regular season GF and GA numbers of late). They lost to Boston, to the Islanders the year before that, and to Carolina the year before that because they couldn't score or generate offense at even strength. Over the past 3 postseasons the Capitals have only scored 1.57 goals/60 at 5v5 (23rd of 25 teams) and have only generated 1.73 xGF/60 (dead last out of 25 teams). Their goals against numbers aren't great either but I think that stems more from the inability of the forwards to possess the puck and do anything meaningful in the offensive zone, making the defense have to continually defend.
They need a legitimate offensive playdriver, which is why I don't think Krejci or Danault fit the bill. They may be Laviolette Guys but it's not enough. They need to be able to put the puck in the net at ES.
- Status
