You need to learn how to read
1. I said 5 on 5 Heineman is a better option than Laine (on simple effort level alone and the amount of puck battles Laine loses) Heineman has the ability to win puck battles along the boards, don't need Laine and Demidov on the same line, no one on that line has the ability to win the physical battles. If I had top pick between Demidov and Laine I take Demidov.
2. I said he's replaceable on the PP by guys like Caufield and Demidov not Heinemann (PP wont suffer without Laine, it's 21st in the league at 20%)
3. They have been trying to get him going since they acquired him !
If you're so gung ho on Laine at the very least toss him off that line and use him like they use Savard. PP specialist and 8 to 10 minutes a game on a 4th line. He is absolutely useless 5 on 5
Like another poster posted
Slafkovsky - Suzuki - Caufield
Anderson - Dvorak - Gallagher
Heinemen - Evans - Demidov
Laine - Newhook - Armia
Just For shits and giggles
Heineman - 62 games played 10 goals , 3 on the PP a -4 - Avg of just over 10 minutes per game on a 4th line
Laine - 52 games 20 goals, 14 on the PP a -14 and Avg of just over 14 minutes a game on a top 2 line - Laine is 6'4 200lbs plus and plays like he's 5'6 160 with zero heart!
I wonder if given a chance Heineman to play in a offensive role his stats might not be better....He's 6'2 200lbs and plays big! Let's not forget how well he was playing prior to getting injured.
I'm NOT suggesting Heineman replace Laine on the PP, I'm suggesting he's a better option as a top 6 than Laine is, Laine has had is chances at securing and meriting that role this year and has disappointed.