Confirmed with Link: Canucks Trade Mark Friedman (RD) to Predators for Future Considerations

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
download.png
 
I got the text notification and I thought it was going to be Boeser. This is the next worst thing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hansen
Good for them to give Friedman a chance elsewhere, I liked him better than Juulsen.

Not sure about this Future Considerationsson kid but not surprised they picked up another Swede.
 
Other than late-round draft picks, what other 'future considerations' actually change hands between teams? Agreeing to put in a waiver claim for a player a team wants to get rid of? Taking on a bad contract in the future?

Would be fascinating to read about all the NHL deals involving 'future considerations' and what this actually meant at the end of the day.
 
i like friedman a lot. more than forbort or juulsen. tocchet obviously doesn't though. nice to see him go somewhere he might get a shot to play

Other than late-round draft picks, what other 'future considerations' actually change hands between teams? Agreeing to put in a waiver claim for a player a team wants to get rid of? Taking on a bad contract in the future?

Would be fascinating to read about all the NHL deals involving 'future considerations' and what this actually meant at the end of the day.

future considerations is almost always just a polite way of saying 'nothing' to spare players embarassment. there are rules in the cba about what can be included in trades and most historical uses (where there was any actual consideration) are no longer valid trades. you can't do stuff like a player to be named later anymore
 
  • Like
Reactions: Indiana
Other than late-round draft picks, what other 'future considerations' actually change hands between teams? Agreeing to put in a waiver claim for a player a team wants to get rid of? Taking on a bad contract in the future?

Would be fascinating to read about all the NHL deals involving 'future considerations' and what this actually meant at the end of the day.

Just an opaque space that I'm curious about, do they have to get resolved by some date? What happens if the teams can't agree to a good value, what's the recourse?
 
Canucks are doing this player a solid. I'm sure they don't mind losing some salary as well.

Friedman belongs in the NHL, not 6th on a depth chart.

Also



Alvinn can't relax on the weekend before he does his Friday trade.


Yup. This is the Canucks giving a good soldier an opportunity to break in somewhere else.

All the best to Friedman. He deserves an NHL look somewhere.
 
Just an opaque space that I'm curious about, do they have to get resolved by some date? What happens if the teams can't agree to a good value, what's the recourse?
it means that if the preds actually wanted friedman then within an undefined time period during the tenure of both current gms if we got into a jam we could ask the preds to give us a player we needed of friedman's stature who is not really in their plans and they'd probably do it.

or if it was the preds who did us a favour then we might do them a similar favour if asked.

but most likely neither team did the other a favour and it was more a favour to the player and is already forgotten as between the teams.
 
Looks to me like a numbers game..It’s getting pretty overcrowded over at the 3rd pairing D department.

With the recent emergence of EP25, something has got to give.

Best of luck to him. A useful bottom of the roster fearless player.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Indiana

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad