Confirmed with Link: Canucks sign RD Vincent Desharnais 2-Year, $2M AAV Contract

vancityluongo

curse of the strombino
Sponsor
Jul 8, 2006
18,828
6,656
Edmonton
regardless of what happens with desharnais i think this signing is open to criticism because they have 5 guys who struggle to win back and play out the puck amongst their 7d and the two that can do it both play on the same pairing

if desharnais was signed for like 500k less or they had another puck mover in the bottom six and they cut forbort then desharnais is probably fine and won't hurt at all

i just think it's a questionable signing when soucy, myers, juulsen and forbort were all already under contract

i don't disagree with this post. especially because the remaining free agent options are limited and it's hard to see how they make an upgrade in the trade market.

but that has nothing to do with the individual player evaluation of desharnais, which was the original point.

in terms of the construction of the d, i think it's harder to get the type of defenseman we've been stocking up on than a waterbug puck mover. like, tyson barrie will be available for a pto in september. kevin shattenkirk would probably take league minimum somewhere if he doesn't retire. if the group is missing that skillset in training camp, it should be easy enough to find.

they can also try out vinny with the best puck mover in the league in limited minutes and go soucy-hronek which could solve the issue too.
 

MS

1%er
Mar 18, 2002
54,715
88,503
Vancouver, BC
i don't personally agree with this take but i think they want forbort for the pk. without cole they only have soucy on the left side to kill penalties and he's not the most durable guy

That's obviously something to take into account, but there are also guys who are a hell of a lot more skilled than Forbort who can still PK.
 

credulous

Registered User
Nov 18, 2021
3,653
4,907
That's obviously something to take into account, but there are also guys who are a hell of a lot more skilled than Forbort who can still PK.

yeah i think they should try to upgrade forbort but i think this is why he'll get priority over desharnais on the roster
 

DFAC

Registered User
Jan 19, 2008
7,555
5,520
Vancouver
My least favourite signing of the bunch - will give management and coaching the benefit of the doubt here. Hoping they can turn his game around like they did with Myers and Juulsen.
 

MS

1%er
Mar 18, 2002
54,715
88,503
Vancouver, BC
He's a player I'm absolutely fascinated to see how he goes here, especially when the coaching staff is this high on him as a pet project.

I mentioned this earlier in the thread, but I saw a lot of him with Bakersfield in the AHL in 21-22 and he was absolutely f***ing fantastic. He was a guy I'd never heard of who was 25 at the time and 6'7 and probably the best all-around defender in the AHL that year - +36 led the AHL and scored 27 ES points in 66 games which is barely worse than what Jack Rathbone put up that year in Abbotsford in his point-per-game season. Like, at that level at that point his puck skills were very impressive for a player of his size and you wonder if and how much more can be unlocked at the NHL level.
 

Tact

Registered User
Jul 9, 2006
2,703
1,643
Yeah I agree the criticism should be the Forbort signing. I’m warming up to this signing, there seems to be potential there that the coaches have targeted. I just watched his interview and he has a great attitude and is excited to put in the work to being better and learning from Foote. He also acknowledges it’s going to be hard and won’t be easy - great mindset.


If there’s any untapped potential there, it’s a great stop gap for Willander. Best case scenario, he grows his game and leaves in two years with a payday.

This is what Tocchet wants - motivated players on short deals with potential to outperform their contracts.

Let’s see where it goes, they may not hit on their target but I understand the logic with this signing
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jovofan

Jack Burton

Pro Tank Since 13
Oct 27, 2016
5,119
3,152
Pork Chop Express
i don't disagree with this post. especially because the remaining free agent options are limited and it's hard to see how they make an upgrade in the trade market.

but that has nothing to do with the individual player evaluation of desharnais, which was the original point.

in terms of the construction of the d, i think it's harder to get the type of defenseman we've been stocking up on than a waterbug puck mover. like, tyson barrie will be available for a pto in september. kevin shattenkirk would probably take league minimum somewhere if he doesn't retire. if the group is missing that skillset in training camp, it should be easy enough to find.

they can also try out vinny with the best puck mover in the league in limited minutes and go soucy-hronek which could solve the issue too.
this.
Could definitely see them trying this out as it spreads the mobility & puck movement through out the d-corps. Also, if you start taking advantage of Hughes then your probably going to catch a dose of VD :sarcasm:

Hughes-VD
Soucy-Hronek
Forbort-Myers
Friedman-Juulsen

Also, Let's also not forget about Abbotsford

Brisebois-Woo
Wolanin-McWard(only waivers exempt guy)
 
  • Like
Reactions: vancityluongo

Agent007

Registered User
Mar 22, 2006
7,715
40
I wonder if eventually the plan is to have Forbort become the 7th D and having signed him to hedge against not losing out. Best case VD can play with Hughes and they can target a LD to play with Hronek (legit number 3 guy). Then you go into the playoffs with Soucy-Myers as that bottom pair.
 

vancityluongo

curse of the strombino
Sponsor
Jul 8, 2006
18,828
6,656
Edmonton
He's a player I'm absolutely fascinated to see how he goes here, especially when the coaching staff is this high on him as a pet project.

I mentioned this earlier in the thread, but I saw a lot of him with Bakersfield in the AHL in 21-22 and he was absolutely f***ing fantastic. He was a guy I'd never heard of who was 25 at the time and 6'7 and probably the best all-around defender in the AHL that year - +36 led the AHL and scored 27 ES points in 66 games which is barely worse than what Jack Rathbone put up that year in Abbotsford in his point-per-game season. Like, at that level at that point his puck skills were very impressive for a player of his size and you wonder if and how much more can be unlocked at the NHL level.

absolutely. he's a guy i was hugely impressed with last season and it's great that we had a perfect storm of the oilers picking the absolute wrong horse in ceci over desharnais, while having him interested in playing here.

this could obviously look very stupid, but i think he could be a #3/4 guy next to soucy by the end of the season. give me this contract every single day over zadorov (who again, was a borderline bottom pairing defenseman for the bulk of his career until getting to calgary, and then taking another step here in the playoffs).
 

Burke's Evil Spirit

Registered User
Oct 29, 2002
21,630
7,901
San Francisco
He's a player I'm absolutely fascinated to see how he goes here, especially when the coaching staff is this high on him as a pet project.

I mentioned this earlier in the thread, but I saw a lot of him with Bakersfield in the AHL in 21-22 and he was absolutely f***ing fantastic. He was a guy I'd never heard of who was 25 at the time and 6'7 and probably the best all-around defender in the AHL that year - +36 led the AHL and scored 27 ES points in 66 games which is barely worse than what Jack Rathbone put up that year in Abbotsford in his point-per-game season. Like, at that level at that point his puck skills were very impressive for a player of his size and you wonder if and how much more can be unlocked at the NHL level.

He came off really well in his interview with Halford and Brought this morning: Halford and Brough in the Morning (27 minutes in)

Came across as a really thoughtful, well-spoken guy, and conveyed the methodical, detail-oriented way he's improved his game. Can't wait to see him here.
 

Burke's Evil Spirit

Registered User
Oct 29, 2002
21,630
7,901
San Francisco
absolutely. he's a guy i was hugely impressed with last season and it's great that we had a perfect storm of the oilers picking the absolute wrong horse in ceci over desharnais, while having him interested in playing here.

this could obviously look very stupid, but i think he could be a #3/4 guy next to soucy by the end of the season. give me this contract every single day over zadorov (who again, was a borderline bottom pairing defenseman for the bulk of his career until getting to calgary, and then taking another step here in the playoffs).

It's not stupid at all. This guy seems to take a meteoric leap in development every year. From being ECHL fodder in 20-21 to a high-end AHL defender in 21-22, to being a replacement level NHL defender in 22-23 to being an elite shot suppression/PK guy in 23-24. Another step like that he could very easily be a top 4 piece.
 

BWJM

Registered User
Sponsor
Mar 16, 2011
2,606
2,951
Just watched his interview, happy we got this guy. Hope he doesn't become a punching bag for us with mistakes.
 

VanJack

Registered User
Jul 11, 2014
21,783
15,225
Probably a slight overpayment for Desharnais, but you can live with a two-year agreement. If it doesn't work out, you've always got Friedman or even Wilander eventually, waiting in the wings.
 

TruGr1t

Proper Villain
Jun 26, 2003
24,130
8,477
Desharnais is a better PKer than Forbort. A lot better, actually.

Eh maybe, recently more comparable, but Forbort has way more of a track record doing it (usually averages ~3 mins per game short-handed). He's been on the Bruins leading PK pair with Carlo for a few seasons, and Boston has had a top 10 (regularly top 3) PK for that period. Desharnais did really well for the Oilers in the playoffs when his PK minutes jumped to near 3 mins, but was largely on their second PK pair with Ekholm in the regular season. They are both basically elite in this regard:

1720048706209.jpeg

1720048759020.jpeg
 
  • Like
Reactions: bossram and BWJM

F A N

Registered User
Aug 12, 2005
19,026
6,090
There was no upside. He was a veteran journeyman basically, and had shown zero offensive ability to that point. He was intended to be a 4/5 D that could maybe caddy Hughes, and $2.5M for that in the flat cap era was more than worth what Poolman was projected to provide.

I would waaaaay rather pay Desharnais 2x2 than the next Poolman 2.5 x 4.

Poolman only played for one organization prior to joining the Canucks. By definition he wasn't a journeyman. I don't think we're going to agree here which is fine.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vector

Bleach Clean

Registered User
Aug 9, 2006
27,396
7,082
The only concern with Desharnais is his puck moving ability. Can he do it to the level of a Juulsen? If so, then there is a player here because he does almost everything else the same or better than Juulsen.

It's the right type of project to take on, but it's an ill fit next to Forbort. So it's not so much a criticism of Desharnais as it is the puck moving ability of the 3rd pair overall.

In the end, if you're going to lose out on Carrier and Walker, this is not a bad alternative at all.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: David71

Bertuzzzi44

Registered User
Jun 26, 2018
3,923
3,723
Like this signing. Biggest area of concern on defence in the playoffs was surprisingly Hughes-Hronek, never would’ve assumed that in a million years, but they were getting absolutely hammered out there, the playoffs are a totally different animal, Myers-Soucy were bending but not breaking and pushing back, Zadorov obviously held his own, but Hughes-Hronek needed to be sheltered in the playoffs which was concerning.
 

ManVanFan

Registered User
Mar 28, 2024
522
533
Vinny D PPGA per 60 was 8.30
Forbort PPGA per 60 was 7.39

Only Cole and Hronek were worse than that last year for players that played the PK on the Canucks.
 

ManVanFan

Registered User
Mar 28, 2024
522
533
Like this signing. Biggest area of concern on defence in the playoffs was surprisingly Hughes-Hronek, never would’ve assumed that in a million years, but they were getting absolutely hammered out there, the playoffs are a totally different animal, Myers-Soucy were bending but not breaking and pushing back, Zadorov obviously held his own, but Hughes-Hronek needed to be sheltered in the playoffs which was concerning.
Hughes-Hronek held a
50% actual goal
53.2% expected goals
54% Corsi

They were probably the 5th best pairing in the playoffs and they weren't sheltered at all.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad