Confirmed with Link: Canucks Sign G Kevin Lankinen to 1y/0.875m Contract

VanJack

Registered User
Jul 11, 2014
22,548
16,013
The whole think with the Lankinen signing was that...a lot of worse goaltenders signed on earlier than he did. He waited and bet on himself. It seems to be panning out. He's looked great playing behind a good team with good coaching and structure, and good goalie coaching to hone the details.
Agreed he waited and bet on himself this summer, but did it really pan out? In his last contract with Nashville, he earned $2m. But this year took a serious haircut to sign with the Canucks for less than $1m.

Hopefully for him, his career mirrors that of Casey DeSmith. He parlayed a stellar year as a Canuck backup last season, into a three year deal with Dallas.
 

VanJack

Registered User
Jul 11, 2014
22,548
16,013
You can tell his pace is falling off a bit because of the workload, but he's still a far better option than Silovs.
Lankinen has been a story for the Canucks in the early going, but the reality is the most games he's ever played in one NHL season is 37 in his first season in Chicago.

The last two seasons in Nashville, he's played 19 and 24 games behind Jusse Saros. So he's a competent career backup, and we may be seeing why. He's a guy who may wear down quickly and not be capable of playing 45-55 games.

I can understand why Tocchet threw Silovs to the wolves against the Devils. It gave Lankinen four days off before the Sharks game on Saturday. They'd still better be praying that Demko returns 'sooner' rather than 'later'.
 

PuckMunchkin

Very Nice, Very Evil!
Dec 13, 2006
12,990
10,682
Lapland
Agreed he waited and bet on himself this summer, but did it really pan out? In his last contract with Nashville, he earned $2m. But this year took a serious haircut to sign with the Canucks for less than $1m.
So far 100% yes.
Hopefully for him, his career mirrors that of Casey DeSmith. He parlayed a stellar year as a Canuck backup last season, into a three year deal with Dallas.
 

F A N

Registered User
Aug 12, 2005
19,499
6,384
Lankinen has been a story for the Canucks in the early going, but the reality is the most games he's ever played in one NHL season is 37 in his first season in Chicago.

The last two seasons in Nashville, he's played 19 and 24 games behind Jusse Saros. So he's a competent career backup, and we may be seeing why. He's a guy who may wear down quickly and not be capable of playing 45-55 games.
Lankinen not playing many games was due to a lack of opportunity. He never got a chance to play a starter’s role. Hard to say if he will wear down and if so whether that’s more due to not being used to it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mossey3535

Canuckle1970

Registered User
Mar 24, 2010
7,298
6,491

supercanuck

Registered User
Mar 2, 2016
2,827
3,484
giphy.webp
 

AzNightmare

Unregistered User
May 11, 2011
1,815
1,553
Agreed he waited and bet on himself this summer, but did it really pan out? In his last contract with Nashville, he earned $2m. But this year took a serious haircut to sign with the Canucks for less than $1m.

Hopefully for him, his career mirrors that of Casey DeSmith. He parlayed a stellar year as a Canuck backup last season, into a three year deal with Dallas.

What's the backstory with Lankinen? I didn't follow him at all prior to the signing.
Did he turn down offers from other teams or something?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Coffee

IComeInPeace

Registered User
Jun 16, 2009
2,522
974
LA
Given Demko’s injury history and pending next contract…

…at what point do you look at Lankinen and try and get him signed long term?

Very small sample size with us, but he did put up almost identical numbers to Saros last season in Nashville (albeit against weaker competition).

Yes there is obvious risk, but if you’re sold on his fundamentals, you could potentially get a starting goalie for really cheap.

He’d have significant motivation to sign a long term deal at this point.

But, if he keeps playing as he is, the longer it goes the stronger the likelihood he wants to test free agency.

A bet on him now could really save some big money at a key position.

Again, I’d only do it if the team was sold on him being technically very sound.

On the other hand Silovs looked good over a similar sample size in the playoffs not long ago.
The difference is Lankinen has significant NHL experience to fall back on.
 

mossey3535

Registered User
Feb 7, 2011
13,972
11,189
Lankinen not playing many games was due to a lack of opportunity. He never got a chance to play a starter’s role. Hard to say if he will wear down and if so whether that’s more due to not being used to it.
Technically in 2020-21 he played 37/56 games. But there's no substitute for dealing with the mental and physical toll of a 50+ workload.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad