Confirmed with Link: Canucks sign G Jiri Patera to 2-Year, 2-Way Contract ($775K)

Lindgren

Registered User
Jun 30, 2005
6,265
4,312
Sooo, do we know that no other team placed a claim and he's on his way to Abby? Or do we have to waive him again later today or tomorrow and there is a chance he's picked up before going to Abby?
Nobody else put in a claim. He's Abbotsford bound.
 

Vector

Moderator
Feb 2, 2007
26,722
44,724
Junktown
Sooo, do we know that no other team placed a claim and he's on his way to Abby? Or do we have to waive him again later today or tomorrow and there is a chance he's picked up before going to Abby?

We do know, yes. Friedman and the like announced the Canucks were the only ones who claimed him and Canucks announced he's been sent to Abbotsford.
 

VanJack

Registered User
Jul 11, 2014
22,310
15,756
A four day holiday for Patera in Beantown......probably no more than a couple of practices.

In the Allvin interview, he claims the Bruins were apologetic for grabbing him on waivers in the first place....not sure if he was being facetious or not....But I guess the B's were just covering their backsides with contract negotiations with Swayman at a stalemate.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ChilliBilly

ChilliBilly

Registered User
Aug 22, 2007
7,257
4,540
chilliwacki
So now that he is back, I guess we are going to have a goalie log jam.

Lankinen, Silovs fighting for backup to Demko.

Silovs goes to Abby once Demko healthy.

So then we have Patera Silovs and tilapia arguing over who get sent to the ECHL

So then we have Ty Young and Koskenvuo in Kalamazoo.

So when everyone is healthy we have 7 goalies fighting for 6 spots.

Doubt the Canucks are going to carry 3 goalies, so is Dear Abby going to have Silovs Patera and Tolopilo fighting for ice time?

The good news is that we have 5 legitimate NHL goalies, (well Tolo has a chance to be an NHL starter some day, if not legitimate yet)

A four day holiday for Patera in Beantown......probably no more than a couple of practices.

In the Allvin interview, he claims the Bruins were apologetic for grabbing him on waivers in the first place....not sure if he was being facetious or not....But I guess the B's were just covering their backsides with contract negotiations with Swayman at a stalemate.
I don't think they were covering their backsides, I think this was a move to pressure Swayman to sign. If so, it worked.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad