69420111, so it fits on a jersey.
Or just to make fun
010- to show it is still a binary world?
(poster ducks, and runs away)
69420111, so it fits on a jersey.
Or just to make fun
010- to show it is still a binary world?
(poster ducks, and runs away)
Jean Beliveau says hello. Or he would if he were still alive. (Or does he say "hold my beer"? This stuff confuses me.)I'm fully on board with ol' Lou.
- goalies may only wear 1, 30, 31, 35
- 2,3,4,5,6 are for defenders.
- forwards may wear numbers between 7 and 29.
- numbers in the 30s (excluding goalie numbers) are for callups.
- numbers should only be retired in extreme circumstances.
High numbers suck. And I'm sticking to this. *Shakes fist at cloud*
Old uniforms and old highlights looked so much cleaner and stylish compared to 74 passing to 86 passing to 40.
I disagree entirely. To me, the high number euro players of my youth (Mogilny, Jagr, Fedorov, Bure for a bit, Palffy for a bit, etc) were super intriguing and fascinating.I'm fully on board with ol' Lou.
- goalies may only wear 1, 30, 31, 35
- 2,3,4,5,6 are for defenders.
- forwards may wear numbers between 7 and 29.
- numbers in the 30s (excluding goalie numbers) are for callups.
- numbers should only be retired in extreme circumstances.
High numbers suck. And I'm sticking to this. *Shakes fist at cloud*
Old uniforms and old highlights looked so much cleaner and stylish compared to 74 passing to 86 passing to 40.
I disagree entirely. To me, the high number euro players of my youth (Mogilny, Jagr, Fedorov, Bure for a bit, Palffy for a bit, etc) were super intriguing and fascinating.
I think that what you're speaking of is pointless rigidity which our history has a hell of a lot of (not turning this into a bigger issue than personal preference on numbers ftr).
One place I do agree is goalie numbers. Wasn't Koskinen number 17? I hated that.
One place I do agree is goalie numbers. Wasn't Koskinen number 17? I hated that.
Kid looks absolutely dynamic
I’ll let you know in July.
That’s a nice and toasty time to be in Tokyo
Just depends how good he is...I'm sure everyone would be pretty happy if we had 3x Quinn Hughes on the left side.He looks dynamic in those Twitter-YouTube highlights......but his stats are pretty pedestrian....only two goals on the season.
As others have pointed out, Jack Rathbone had better stats as a younger player at Harvard. And I guess it's Hirose that Rathbone he'll be competing with for a job with the Canucks. Don't see how the Canucks could go with three relatively under-sized d-men on their back end though.
Plus worst case scenario you trade one of the non Hughes 3 for another player if they all work out. But it’s highly unlikely all 3 work out.Just depends how good he is...I'm sure everyone would be pretty happy if we had 3x Quinn Hughes on the left side.
I'm sort of half joking which I hope my tone conveyed.
But old highlights and photos of Rocket Richard in #9 or Bobby Orr in #4 is so much cleaner and crisper and cooler and more classic than guys wearing 43 and 74.
I actually don't mind the double-barreled numbers like 44 and 55 and the backstory behind why guys like Mogilny and Jagr wore their numbers was at least kind of interesting and cool.
But Bure in 10 was great and looked great and Bure in 96 was dumb and crap. Jeremy Roenick going from 27 to 97 was dumb. Guys wearing weird numbers like 73 that look like someone barfed across the back of their jersey look dumb. And thank god Joe Sakic didn't stick with 88.
No one cares if some hockey player in Canada has Japanese ancestry. The league tried that with Paul Kariya and it went absolutely nowhere.
damn his skating reminds me of Hughes
i'm willing to bet that if kariya had played those two games in tokyo, that could have generated some real excitement about the olympic hockey tournament. exciting japanese-canadian superstar, disney tie in, it should have worked. and then if he was on that olympic team, and they don't lose in the shootout to the czech republic, and assuming they beat russia in the gold medal game, i think that could have really been something for the sport in japan and, i'm guessing, east asia more broadly.
I agree with the “numbers should only be retired in extreme circumstances “ part. For a franchise that’s never won it all, the Canucks have a lot of sweaters in the rafters. At what point does an unretiring ceremony happen??I'm fully on board with ol' Lou.
- goalies may only wear 1, 30, 31, 35
- 2,3,4,5,6 are for defenders.
- forwards may wear numbers between 7 and 29.
- numbers in the 30s (excluding goalie numbers) are for callups.
- numbers should only be retired in extreme circumstances.
High numbers suck. And I'm sticking to this. *Shakes fist at cloud*
Old uniforms and old highlights looked so much cleaner and stylish compared to 74 passing to 86 passing to 40.
I agree with the “numbers should only be retired in extreme circumstances “ part. For a franchise that’s never won it all, the Canucks have a lot of sweaters in the rafters. At what point does an unretiring ceremony happen??