iceburg
Don't ask why
- Aug 31, 2003
- 7,603
- 3,943
Management has done a good job of improving organizational depth in all areas with one exception. They have good depth in the bottom 6 with a couple of guys that can do ok in the top 6 in certain situations. Boeser, DeBrusk, Garland, and the young sniper Lekkerimaki is fine as long as they deal with attrition such as the loss of Boeser. Hoglander could yet be a decent 2nd line winger, especially if chemistry with EP can be developed further. If the trajectories of D-Petey, Marino, Willander, Kudryavtsev, and Mynio continue on the same curve they will have finally solved the D conundrum after so many years. A healthy Demko/Lankinen would be among the top tandems in the league. In all of these areas it really just is a job of maintenance, making sure they have enough quality coming in as it inevitably leaves.
Of course the one exception is centre ice. It's kinda shocking going from Miller, 100 pt Petey, and Horvat to a slumping 60pt Petey, Chytil and Suter. It's arguable that without Suter they actually wouldn't be in any position to think about playoffs.
They will need to spend the next three years drafting the centre ice position as early and often as possible. Unless there is clearly a better choice at another position, pick centres with high skill and hockey sense. To me, size at centre in the top 6 is a nice to have but it should not come at the expense of skill, otherwise you end up with a bunch of big 3Cs and no true top line guys. They will still likely have to trade from a position of strength or sign a UFA to acquire an interim 2C but that ain't going to be cheap.
If, in three years, they don't have 2 or 3 highly skilled centre prospects 22 or under, it will be a problem of their own making.
Of course the one exception is centre ice. It's kinda shocking going from Miller, 100 pt Petey, and Horvat to a slumping 60pt Petey, Chytil and Suter. It's arguable that without Suter they actually wouldn't be in any position to think about playoffs.
They will need to spend the next three years drafting the centre ice position as early and often as possible. Unless there is clearly a better choice at another position, pick centres with high skill and hockey sense. To me, size at centre in the top 6 is a nice to have but it should not come at the expense of skill, otherwise you end up with a bunch of big 3Cs and no true top line guys. They will still likely have to trade from a position of strength or sign a UFA to acquire an interim 2C but that ain't going to be cheap.
If, in three years, they don't have 2 or 3 highly skilled centre prospects 22 or under, it will be a problem of their own making.