I love how management’s idea of “working together” is your ass gonna be traded and we want you to prepare for that. Also PS kindly waive your NMC.
Ah yes, Quinn Hughes is the REAL problem in the room. Now that's a take.
Top players are competitive both for team and individual success. He deserves recognition for what he is accomplishing.
Are you?
fwiw Chris Johnston said on overdrive he expects some action pre 4nations, nothing during, and then alot before tdl..Trades Before the 4 Nations Tournament
- Doesn’t think anything is imminent
- No trades percolating like the Miller situation; Rantanen trade was unexpected
- Nothing jumps out that is going to happen before now and the start of the tournament
- Very curious what the Seattle Kraken are going to do
He wouldn't be upset that he didn't win a Norris trophy because the team missed the playoffs? You sure about that?
Curious what you would be doing to replace Miller and Boeser's 77 goals?
I love how management’s idea of “working together” is your ass gonna be traded and we want you to prepare for that. Also PS kindly waive your NMC.
He as an NMC this season thoughThey are pretty cutthroat but in fairness he only has an NTC, not an NMC, and it would be pretty reasonable to waive him if he's not going to be in the starting lineup. This way he gets some control over his destination.
he recently wrote an article for puckpedia that makes me question how he was ever an assistant GM: https://puckpedia.com/news/canucks-trades-werierFormer assistant GM offers blockbuster trade proposal involving Canucks' J.T. Miller
A former assistant GM of the NHL has recently presented a blockbuster trade scenario involving Canucks' JT Miller in a massive three-way deal.www.yardbarker.com
This gem of embarrassment ..
This is largely circumstantial. Sometimes your bets work out (Quinn Hughes, Jake Sanderson) and sometimes your bets do not (Colin White, Josh Norris), and the best surplus value you can get is out of your depth players. Star players should be paid for, and it's a bonus if you are paying less than market value, but it's not something that will tank your contending status."To build a contender, a team needs to sign contracts where the surplus value of at least a few star players relative to their cap hits is substantial. "
Fernstrom might end up being good, but it seems like he thinks Fernstrom is lighting up his D+1 season, and he is not.The Canucks including Fernstrom in the deal with the Pens raises some potential organizational red flags. A few months ago, Vancouver selected Fernstrom with their first pick in the 2024 Draft (3rd round, pick #93). Their amateur scouts wouldn’t have used that first at bat casually –they likely valued him highly. From my own experience, the player you select around there is typically one you internally ranked around 45-55 overall; there’s a lot of team by team variance across draft boards after the first round. At this stage, Fernstrom is still a lottery ticket, but he’s more like a $20 scratch-off than the $1 variety. Vancouver should be stockpiling assets like this, not shipping them out as unnecessary throw-ins to help jettison bad contracts in a deal where they’re the ones already shipping out a potentially unprotected 2026 1st. I don’t like it, and if I was a Canucks amateur scout, I would have been banging my head pretty hard when I saw both Fernstrom and the NYR 1st included in that second deal.
I am pretty confident that Marcus Pettersson is a better player than Jake Walman, and I think Walman is decent.I’m always a little skeptical when a manager trades with his old club for one of his old players. It doesn’t always mean they’re overvaluing familiarity, but it doesn’t always mean they aren’t. Hearing the Canucks President immediately wax poetic about how well he made out seven years ago, the last time he traded for Marcus Pettersson – something that should be completely irrelevant to the 2025 calculus – suggests familiarity was a not insignificant factor here. And I do think the Canucks paid far too much for Pettersson given (i) he’s a pending UFA and (ii) Vancouver, sans Miller, doesn’t appear to be a contender this year. For instance, I wonder what it would have cost them to acquire a similar, pending UFA puck moving defenseman in San Jose’s Jake Walman. I doubt it would have cost a potentially unprotected 1st.
He as an NMC this season though
its NTC (so he could get waived)He as an NMC this season though
BingoPersonally I think he's better than that. The team comes first for great players and Quinn is the best we've ever had. He's not egotistical like that.
An industry plant!Seravalli is a hack who the old boys club has designated as insider, they kickstarted his career with the Kraken expansion draft leaks
Makes sense. Teams don't want to risk their players getting injured during the tourney causing the potential trade to fall through.fwiw Chris Johnston said on overdrive he expects some action pre 4nations, nothing during, and then alot before tdl..
fwiw Chris Johnston said on overdrive he expects some action pre 4nations, nothing during, and then alot before tdl..
I am pretty confident that Marcus Pettersson is a better player than Jake Walman, and I think Walman is decent.
you guys are really trying hard to rationalize and support that deal and getting stuck in on semantics.he recently wrote an article for puckpedia that makes me question how he was ever an assistant GM: https://puckpedia.com/news/canucks-trades-werier
This is largely circumstantial. Sometimes your bets work out (Quinn Hughes, Jake Sanderson) and sometimes your bets do not (Colin White, Josh Norris), and the best surplus value you can get is out of your depth players. Star players should be paid for, and it's a bonus if you are paying less than market value, but it's not something that will tank your contending status.
Fernstrom might end up being good, but it seems like he thinks Fernstrom is lighting up his D+1 season, and he is not.
I am pretty confident that Marcus Pettersson is a better player than Jake Walman, and I think Walman is decent.
Not from what I'm seeing. Where are you getting that from? He has an NTC, which allows him to block trades, but not an NMC, which would allow him to block being waived and demoted. Obviously he would prefer to be traded.
I could’ve sworn puckpedia showed Soucy as having an NMC.its NTC (so he could get waived)
I could’ve sworn puckpedia showed Soucy as having an NMC.
Wasnt he referring to another GM talking about M.Pettersson
I guess i'm a lot more skeptical of this M.Pettersson move than most here
I would be annoyed with Fernstrom and a 2nd though given we just stepped out the Stanley Cup race
When did it change to a steep discount?I mean everything from Rantanen saying he would have taken a steep discount to MacKinnon being visibly shaken up by it in an interview, maybe there's been some off-ice drama that stemmed from the move.
Don't really understand his comments on M Pettersson. Sounds like he just isn't a fan of him.
I knew about the 12 team, I thought he specifically had a NMC for this season, which is why I was wondering where the waiving him talk was coming from.
Sorry, "significant" discountWhen did it change to a steep discount?
Sorry, "significant" discount