hot take: if allvin doesn’t turn this team around next year he should be fired.
hot take: if allvin doesn’t turn this team around next year he should be fired.
HOTTER TAKE: If you are wrong, next year, you are fired as a fan and officiallly become: hater.
I prefer "Play like Sbisa to draft Misa".Fans "TANK FOR MISA"
Also fans "WE HAVE NO LOTTERY LUCK"
YO, how can you beg for royalties when you have no pot to put them in? WE HAVE ZERO LUCK.
Revenue, then you have to pay tax, pay players, coaches and management, opex of the team and stadium, minor league. The fact player cost 90M despite them operating close to cap min shows you how much other cost there are.
Hottest take: Aquilini should f*** off.hot take: if allvin doesn’t turn this team around next year he should be fired.
To complete the prophecy that this is merely a 2009-esque setback, who will we be the neo-Sundin from the Leafs? Tavares to mentor Raty on the wing for a season?
I've updated a big ol' list of this summer's UFAs. The contract is what is currently being projected by AFP. This will be updated when they release their final projections.
Edit: The site REALLY doesn't want to support copy and pasting from spreadsheets.
You are not getting Misa unless you are picking Top 3.
Nucks have no luck.
We will be picking in the low teens. Mayb 12th.
That is why you trade for the pick AFTER the lottery, which comes much earlier.Fans "TANK FOR MISA"
Also fans "WE HAVE NO LOTTERY LUCK"
YO, how can you beg for royalties when you have no pot to put them in? WE HAVE ZERO LUCK.
Hot take, this is genuinely a competent and competitive management team, we should stop choosing the mystery box every time we suffer a setback. It has some clear strengths and some things it needs to work on, let them evolve and work on them. This organization could use some long term consistency rather than running around chasing a 'grass is greener on the other side' fallacy.hot take: if allvin doesn’t turn this team around next year he should be fired.
Brock's single 40 goal season is really going some heavy lifting here, isn't it? 9M for him is wild when they have Ehlers at 7.5M
Of course. I don't expect him to actually get 9M when teams were hesitant to even trade for him. Nor do I expect Ehlers to be undervalued like that.
And take the team to Houston right!!!!Hottest take: Aquilini should f*** off.
If you want to cling to this idea that the Ducks are some poverty franchise that can't spend to the cap if they're in a competitive situation to warrant it, have at it. The reality is they can, and likely will when that time comes, which is possibly not too far away.Revenue, then you have to pay tax, pay players, coaches and management, opex of the team and stadium, minor league. The fact player cost 90M despite them operating close to cap min shows you how much other cost there are.
Bring in Mikael Granlund to be the next Demitra.To complete the prophecy that this is merely a 2009-esque setback, who will we be the neo-Sundin from the Leafs? Tavares to mentor Raty on the wing for a season?
both management and coaching are pretty competent. biggest weakness i see is they have shown a tendency to draw out negotiations in a rising market and fail to lock up players.Hot take, this is genuinely a competent and competitive management team, we should stop choosing the mystery box every time we suffer a setback. It has some clear strengths and some things it needs to work on, let them evolve and work on them. This organization could use some long term consistency rather than running around chasing a 'grass is greener on the other side' fallacy.
The instinct to want to punish and get retribution for disappointment needs to be crushed. I mean look at the Jets, for all the regional challenges that org deals with they've had one general manager since it's inception.
Last time we sprinted for the mystery box we tossed a competent management group and then suffered through the long, hopeless Lindenning era.
hot take: if allvin doesn’t turn this team around next year he should be fired.
And replaced by.....?i think he should be fired right now actually
So
1. They did it before
2. Hope
3. They arent in on marner
These are reasons?
If nothing else my guess is if that’s the case he almost certainly will be fired.hot take: if allvin doesn’t turn this team around next year he should be fired.
This was basically my view when people were debating whether Gillis should be fired. I think the same is true now.Hot take, this is genuinely a competent and competitive management team, we should stop choosing the mystery box every time we suffer a setback. It has some clear strengths and some things it needs to work on, let them evolve and work on them. This organization could use some long term consistency rather than running around chasing a 'grass is greener on the other side' fallacy.
The instinct to want to punish and get retribution for disappointment needs to be crushed. I mean look at the Jets, for all the regional challenges that org deals with they've had one general manager since it's inception.
Last time we sprinted for the mystery box we tossed a competent management group and then suffered through the long, hopeless Lindenning era.
This is so tiring, if you guys don’t anything to support your argument, just say it. Going to hyperbole just shows you don’t have anything to stand on.If you want to cling to this idea that the Ducks are some poverty franchise that can't spend to the cap if they're in a competitive situation to warrant it, have at it. The reality is they can, and likely will when that time comes, which is possibly not too far away.
Yeah i think you can see them learn from the mistakes already. Last season they weren’t aggressive in retaining Z and Lindholm and that led to assets being wasted. This time around they basically signed both MP and DoC almost immediately. That’s the thing, yeah ppl make mistakes, just don’t f***ing repeat it. I think they are good at a bunch of stuff and if they can fix and improve on things that they are not good with, then it’s fine.Hot take, this is genuinely a competent and competitive management team, we should stop choosing the mystery box every time we suffer a setback. It has some clear strengths and some things it needs to work on, let them evolve and work on them. This organization could use some long term consistency rather than running around chasing a 'grass is greener on the other side' fallacy.
The instinct to want to punish and get retribution for disappointment needs to be crushed. I mean look at the Jets, for all the regional challenges that org deals with they've had one general manager since it's inception.
Last time we sprinted for the mystery box we tossed a competent management group and then suffered through the long, hopeless Lindenning era.