JT Milker
Registered User
- Mar 24, 2018
- 1,235
- 2,779
Can’t buy him out while he has a concy.Here's his buyout. It's not that bad to be honest, especially with the rising cap: View attachment 1004109
Can’t buy him out while he has a concy.Here's his buyout. It's not that bad to be honest, especially with the rising cap: View attachment 1004109
Can’t buy him out while he has a concy.
just checked his EDGE stats, his speed is wild, it's like drastically different every season, goes from 90percentil to like below 50 back to 70ish and then back to 50ish. Was he injured a lot?I'm not saying it's a reasonable expectation. I'm just saying that if the Rangers are looking to trade him I could see the ask being something we're willing to do. And "worth" is completely dependent on the type of player he is going forward. His previous seasons where he scored 28 goals and 57 points including 8 goals and 14 points in 16 games in the playoffs suggests he could get to that 30G 50A production level. This year not so much.
I think his skill level is fine, has good instincts, and has a good one timer. But obviously if you don't like him you might not want to touch his contract.
In a press conference during their 12 game losing streak earlier this season Quinn's name came up when the topic was contract extensions/spending money (and all their unutilized cap space). Adams was grumbling about his ask and when the reporter said something about his slow start to the season keeping a lid on his next deal, Adams told the reporter to "tell that to his agent". He's turned it on a bit in garbage time and his numbers look less hideous than they did over his first 23 games when he had 1 G 4A, but i got the sense they weren't really sold on the player at all and hated the idea of having to pay him what he was asking for.Seen some people mention Jack Quinn as an offer sheet target. He's recently kinda revived his season, and he has some pedigree that might hint at more upside.
The $4.58M threshold is a 2nd round pick. Buffalo will have the cap space to match, but Pegula has been pretty cheap with the franchise in recent years. A multi-year deal that is front-loaded + almost all signing bonus might just make Pegula/Adams balk at the cash.
He hasn't played center in the NHL, but he was a center in junior. Unlikely, but might be an option to explore.
Not at 19. 23 maybeNo team ever does, that's how they become reclamation projects.
So along with a 5.5M of dead cap, they have a 4.4M of maybe Ltir, unless Chytil says he's fine which could be late in the summer, not sure how they will operate with this hanging over the heads. That bounty on Dickinson better get collected next season.
If we want to assign depth numbers, amongst all forwards at 5v5 over the past 2 seasons Pius Suter is:
#58 in goals / 60
#153 in points / 60
#156 in xGoal / 60
That firmly places him as a #5.
(this was filtered to the 354 players with a minimum 1000 minutes)
I've been concerned with all the site changes that this amazing post was going to be lost in the ether, but with the Lafreniere talk it's prime time to post it.
View attachment 1004262
View attachment 1004265
Right. So Buffalo isn't going to dump him as a reclamation project right now and it's silly to suggest they wouldThat's what I'm gettin at.
Stay. In. Your. Lane. Canucks fans.Given the rumours around Peterka wanting out and Tuch’s contract status, Benson isn’t the one who might be available via trade.
Stay. In. Your. Lane. Canucks fans.
We have evolved to realize we are a bottom 10 cap situation and wont be the finalists for Ehlers and Bennett. Does anyone see the assets required to grab any of these players via trade or offersheet they are suggesting?!
Utah, for example, is sitting on 20 former high picks, just traded the Weber contract to give themselves ample room, and actually have a young core to trade for and still surround a JJ Peterka with.
We, do not.
Especially not robbing Peter to pay Paul like what a Benson would cost (Hronek or Willander likely)
Marco Rossi offersheet, I hate the player but could see it.
Jack Quinn, I could see it.
Once you start thinking above that line, your all just setting yourselves up for Cozens, Norris dissapointment, yet again.
The bolded is absolutely not true.
FYI for those that care, I updated my spreadsheet with roster and cap info for the off-season.
Edit: Well, tables are completely f***ed. Let me do this manually.
1) Columbus Blue Jackets - 43.89 - 14/23
2) San Jose Sharks - 42.03 - 17/23
3) Anaheim Ducks - 39.55 - 15/23
4) Caglary Flames - 37.14 - 14/23
5) Winnipeg Jets - 37.13 - 15/23
6) Carolina Hurricanes - 37.09 - 15/23
7) Chicago Blackhawks - 36.63 - 15/23
8) New York Islanders - 29.67 - 13/23
9) Boston Bruins - 27.08 - 13/23
10) Philadelphia Flyers - 26.62 - 17/23
11) Pittsburgh Penguins - 26.34 - 16/23
12) Los Angeles Kings - 26.06 - 17/23
13) Toronto Maple Leafs 25.18 - 18/23
14) Buffalo Sabres - 23.21 - 16/23
15) Detroit Red Wings - 22.34 - 17/23
16) Seattle Kraken - 21.75 - 14/23
17) Utah Hockey Club - 21.16 - 20/23
18) Minnesota Wild - 20.73 - 17/23
19) Nashville Predators - 19.14 - 19/23
20) Florida Panthers - 19.00 - 16/23
21) Ottawa Senators - 16.89 - 15/23
22) Vancouver Canucks - 15.93 - 18/23
23) New Jersey Devils - 14.81 - 17/23
24) Edmonton Oilers - 14.71 - 17/23
25) Washington Capitals - 14.1 - 17/23
26) Montreal Canadiens - 12.29 - 15/23
27) New York Rangers - 12.34 - 15/23
28) Vegas Golden Knights - 10.49 - 17/23
29) St. Louis Blues - 9.01 - 20/23
30) Tampa Bay Lightning - 7.95- 17/23
31) Colorado Avalanche - 7.92 - 18/23
32) Dallas Stars - 6.24 - 15/23
You know the answer to this.Do people just look at teams upcoming cap space and fawn or do they look at actually rosters and players that need to be signed etc?
Right. So Buffalo isn't going to dump him as a reclamation project right now and it's silly to suggest they would
Extend Surer, trade Garland, play Lekk on the 3rd line, use Garland’s cap on a 2nd line winger that has a more defined strength, either pure scorer or playmaker that has speed. Use remaining cap on another 2nd line winger that is a playmaker and play him on the top line. Technically those 2 could be a stop gap solution and can be a cheaper option. Save the money on the 2C, if we can’t spend it on one then get a budget 2C and then go into the season with cap and use that to get a guy with the intention to extend at TDL.So along with a 5.5M of dead cap, they have a 4.4M of maybe Ltir, unless Chytil says he's fine which could be late in the summer, not sure how they will operate with this hanging over the heads. That bounty on Dickinson better get collected next season.
Do people just look at teams upcoming cap space and fawn or do they look at actually rosters and players that need to be signed etc?
The bolded is absolutely not true.
We have to look at moving most if not all of Chytil, Hoglander, Joshua (as hard as it may be), Blueger, and possibly Lankinen.when you consider who is expiring on the canucks roster and who is expiring on the teams with less cap space the canucks are probably like bottom five cap situation
dallas is worse. colorado is probably worse depending on what happens with nelson and landeskog. tampa is arguably worse but only if you think they need to resign gourde. st louis and montreal have less cap space but also are losing basically no one they'll need to replace. new york and edmonton are probably about equal to vancouver but all new yorks free agents are rfas and edmonton just has bouchard and maybe skinner or frederic to really worry about
every other team either has more cap space than they can use or have their rosters already set
this doesn't mean vancouver will finish bottom five next year of course but they are faced with losing two key players in boeser and suter and they don't have the cap space to throw around that teams like carolina, winnipeg, minnesota, florida and los angeles have
this is a little out of date now with some subsequent contracts but nothing has gotten better for vancouver