ManVanFan
Registered User
- Mar 28, 2024
- 1,941
- 1,654
You think you can fill 3 top 6 forwards for 14M?we have 14M in cap and really 3 spots to fill, wtf are you talking about?
You think you can fill 3 top 6 forwards for 14M?we have 14M in cap and really 3 spots to fill, wtf are you talking about?
The Leafs have $27MM in cap space and three guys to re-sign (two if Marner hits the road). they will sign him for a couple years probably at a team friendly $$. he's not going anywhere IMO. still a good player and he's made so much money ($112MM) I doubt he even cares what the next contract brings in.I’m fine with Tavares but not at 7.5M. 5.5M at most.
confused as to why a rhd elc player making the team would force you to move a lhd elc player. if willander is good enough he is going to be pushing mancini into the #7 slot if everyone is healthy. more likely they ripen him in abby though to make sure he learns the system thoroughly.
also imo moving a dman during their sophomore season is a big no no. regression is nearly automatic once rookie treatment ends so you are selling low.
we are eventually going to get jammed if kudryatsev and mynio continue to come on.
well considering 1 of the open spots is the the 13th forward, yeah.You think you can fill 3 top 6 forwards for 14M?
I rather trade our picks before D-Petey, I think he is going to be a very solid top 4D, is young and team control for many more years, and is physical (something we are lacking on the back end). Trading D-Petey could come back and bite us big time if he does end up a young-Edler. If (and that is a big if) we are forced to trade him down the road, he will be infinitely more valuable once he is proven than as a rookie.i keep thinking about a comment @MS made about how hard it is to shelter two rookie defensemen on a contending roster. it's less about the rhd willander pushing out the lhd d-petey, but moreso that with the way hronek, pettersson, and post-soucy myers have looked, we have a very strong top-4 without needing to bank on a rookie to play one of those roles.
add that forbort has basically been a perfect bottom pairing vet, and that the forward group needs more than a prayer that ehlers will sign here, it feels like the natural starting point to move a young defenseman. doubly so, as you've noted, with guys like mancini, kudryatsev and mynio all fairly close too, and no one aside from lekk comparable up front (if bains and raty are part of the solution... lol)
disagree that d-pete would be at a low in value, i think the "next edler" narrative goes a long way, and there is an absolute shortage of players with this skillset league wide. a team like buffalo, even though they are loaded with young defenseman, should be all over an actual tough 21 year old that wins his minutes. or a team like chicago, where they don't really care what he does in his sophomore year... could someone like nazar be put on the table? two of our three options to get a player of that calibre are named elias pettersson (the other is willander), and if we're talking about selling low, there's one i'd certainly look to trade over the other...
I agree, it can become difficult to play two rookie defensemen at the same time and not end-up overleveraging them, short of them being savants entering the league like Hughes or Makar or Fox. When injuries hit NJ last season and they had to ride Luke and Nemec heavily, it wasn't the best season for them.i keep thinking about a comment @MS made about how hard it is to shelter two rookie defensemen on a contending roster. it's less about the rhd willander pushing out the lhd d-petey, but moreso that with the way hronek, pettersson, and post-soucy myers have looked, we have a very strong top-4 without needing to bank on a rookie to play one of those roles.
add that forbort has basically been a perfect bottom pairing vet, and that the forward group needs more than a prayer that ehlers will sign here, it feels like the natural starting point to move a young defenseman. doubly so, as you've noted, with guys like mancini, kudryatsev and mynio all fairly close too, and no one aside from lekk comparable up front (if bains and raty are part of the solution... lol)
disagree that d-pete would be at a low in value, i think the "next edler" narrative goes a long way, and there is an absolute shortage of players with this skillset league wide. a team like buffalo, even though they are loaded with young defenseman, should be all over an actual tough 21 year old that wins his minutes. or a team like chicago, where they don't really care what he does in his sophomore year... could someone like nazar be put on the table? two of our three options to get a player of that calibre are named elias pettersson (the other is willander), and if we're talking about selling low, there's one i'd certainly look to trade over the other...
The more kids you have on the backend, the more vital the vets are, as well as the guys who would get called up to cover in case of injuries. Hughes, Hronek, Myers, M. Pettersson are your top 4. If Petey/Wallinder make the club, they are not playing together. #7 guy will be important.I agree, it can become difficult to play two rookie defensemen at the same time and not end-up overleveraging them, short of them being savants entering the league like Hughes or Makar or Fox. When injuries hit NJ last season and they had to ride Luke and Nemec heavily, it wasn't the best season for them.
I don't think that means we immediately trade D-Petey or Willander though. Obviously if the right deal is there, anyone is available. But I see no issue if one or both of them spend next season in Abby.
The thing is that with the cap rising, a lot of teams are in spots like this. We're going to see the true return of silly season in July
Now explain who and what you are getting for those spots and don't forget at least an extra D or two.
i am not bald and swedishNow explain who and what you are getting for those spots and don't forget at least an extra D or two.
I rather trade our picks before D-Petey, I think he is going to be a very solid top 4D, is young and team control for many more years, and is physical (something we are lacking on the back end). Trading D-Petey could come back and bite us big time if he does end up a young-Edler. If (and that is a big if) we are forced to trade him down the road, he will be infinitely more valuable once he is proven than as a rookie.
I agree, it can become difficult to play two rookie defensemen at the same time and not end-up overleveraging them, short of them being savants entering the league like Hughes or Makar or Fox. When injuries hit NJ last season and they had to ride Luke and Nemec heavily, it wasn't the best season for them.
I don't think that means we immediately trade D-Petey or Willander though. Obviously if the right deal is there, anyone is available. But I see no issue if one or both of them spend next season in Abby.
Are we watching the same Canucks team? At this point - I'd be surprised if we weren't swept by the Jets in the 1st round
I think another option if they can’t get a guy like Ehlers/Marner is to bet low on a bunch of underutilized potential 2nd liners or get older guys on super short term deals and use them as short term patches.
Assuming they miss out on Bennett, which is, let's be honest, pretty likely, I think they'll absolutely pivot to Tavares (if he hits the market) and Granlund. Outside of that, I guess you could take a shot on a guy like Donato, but I'm not convinced his uptick in production isn't just linked to playing for a bad Chicago team.
If you have no UFA options, I think it's likely they give Suter a new contract and try to bolster scoring on the wings.
The problem I see is that even spending on these "stop gap" options at center is only good if you have something coming up to fill that gap, and thats something we don't have...even if we draft one this year that's probably a bigger gap than we'd want.
like I said the money is there, maybe Ehlers would love to come and that solves 1 hole and we have to throw 2 1sts away to get that 2C. the point is, the money is there and cap won't be the reason why we can't fill those spots.
I can definitely see us going after Granlund and/or Roslovic. At this point Brock Nelson might be one of the best options but he'll be looking for term. I highly doubt Tavares comes West for some reason. I think Donato would be a good target as well but I think he re-signs in Chicago.
i am not bald and swedish
Like I said the teams that have the same amount of cap space don't have the holes that Van has.like I said the money is there, maybe Ehlers would love to come and that solves 1 hole and we have to throw 2 1sts away to get that 2C. the point is, the money is there and cap won't be the reason why we can't fill those spots.
every team has holes to fill i have no idea what you are talking about.Like I said the teams that have the same amount of cap space don't have the holes that Van has.
every team has holes to fill i have no idea what you are talking about.
are you assuming that all the UFAs will be gone and then we make zero signings?
Look at the other teams that have similar cap space to Van next season. I beg of you to tell me those teams have the same massive holes in their top 6 that Van has.every team has holes to fill i have no idea what you are talking about.
are you assuming that all the UFAs will be gone and then we make zero signings?
MTL is going to get 10M in cap space added to their 12 already once Price goes on LTIR. This season as Nucker said you can't even go find a team that wants to clear 5M in cap space to get a 10M player because basically everyone has 10M or more except for a few teams that are pretty much set.i don't think there'll be zero movement this offseason but i think there'll be way less than people expect. almost every team has the cap space to reup all their players if they want. the only exceptions are dallas who may have to let some players walk depending on whether seguin is healthy, boston who need to replace basically half their team (altho they might just rebuild) and edmonton who might have to let skinner go if bouchard gets a big extension
there's a few teams like colorado, vegas, st louis, montreal and tampa who have little cap space but also have very little in the way of significant free agents (brock nelson in colorado aside although they can probably keep him if landeskog retires)
the market is really going to be defined by players who want out of their current situations more than by players being squeezed out because teams can't afford to keep them