ffh
Registered User
- Jul 16, 2016
- 8,379
- 5,421
So basically business as usual by a hockey team. i'll put out a tweet to make it sound like this is not common everyday pre draft thinking for teams.
After 8th, you can make a case for Reinbacher, Simashev, or Willander to be picked.Trading up to draft a defenseman in the most forward heavy draft in the last 20 years would be wild.
Make it so Patrik
After 8th, you can make a case for Reinbacher, Simashev, or Willander to be picked.
I know that two years in a row, we got a bump due to a new coach, and that those two were supportive of playing the crap out of the better players. They played Demko a lot for garbage time after he came back from an injury.You know Allvin and Rutherford aren't there on the ice right?
First half he was poor, mostly due to health. he had a great playoffs when healthyPass. Lekkerimaki had a very underwhelming d+1 season. Definitely not enough to drop from 5 to 11
Meh. Rather keep the 5th. There is a drop off in talent after 5/6. Dropping to 11 to potentially end up with a couple ok players isn’t appealing. Montreal has a deep prospect pool. They need stars. Not more depth playersFirst half, he had a great playoffs when healthy
Sinking Podkolzin to move up 1 or 2 spots in the draft seems like a horrendous use of assets.
So you have already deducted that they are zeroing in on a defender and not the best player available? Must be nice to be so plugged in.Moving up for a defenceman.
Ah yes. Lets draft for need again and not the best player available. Thats worked so well for us in the past.
The Habs would have to REALLY like Silovs to drop from the top 5. And I don't think he's quite at that level, necessarily.I think 11th + Silovs is what they're looking to move. Maybe a team like the Habs or Coyotes bite on a young top goaltender prospect.
Not a chance that Silovs is worth thst kind of moveI think 11th + Silovs is what they're looking to move. Maybe a team like the Habs or Coyotes bite on a young top goaltender prospect.
It would be almost as bad as being a Flames fan.Trading up to draft a defenseman in the most forward heavy draft in the last 20 years would be wild.
Make it so Patrik
You realize the teams top players actually have a stake in how much they play and produce right? Do you think Petey wanted to end up with 92 points? JT wanted to get 70 points after signing the big deal? Or Demko didn’t want to redeem himself and square up his record and his save pctg? Maybe Hughes wanted to flirt with 80 points or maybe the new coach wanted to establish a good rapport with the teams core?I know that two years in a row, we got a bump due to a new coach, and that those two were supportive of playing the crap out of the better players. They played Demko a lot for garbage time after he came back from an injury.
It would be almost as bad as being a Flames fan.
Conroy will sort it all out. He’ll just talk everyone’s ear off.
They have all the core pieces most teams look to tank for. They have their studs at C/D/G. They're all in or hitting their prime. I don't see the issue with trying to improve the roster while also trying to add a decent young prospect at the same time. The defense core is really the biggest issue imo. Not sure how they solidify it, but if they could I don't think they're as terrible as people make them sound.I honestly don't understand what Vancouver is trying to do, they simultaneously seem to be both trying to improve the roster while also trying to rebuild. There's no direction here, you see them trade off Horvat for futures just to trade significant futures for Hronek.