Confirmed with Link: Canucks announce HC Rick Tocchet will Not Return

Comparing draft picks across GMs is a little bit of a fools errand if you ask me. So much depends on where the team picks, the strength of the draft etc. That said, a simple analysis of picks outside of the top 10 (historically all top 10 players play at least 100 games with few exceptions) shows that Nonis did well based largely on that 2004 draft, Benning did ok based largely on the 2014 draft, and Gillis did the worst. But the difference is so small. Basically, by percentage of picks over 6-7 years Gillis picked 2 fewer players that went on to play more than 100 games. To say that that is franchise altering is a stretch, to be polite. One of those extra players is Jonah Gadjovich and Benning traded away two others...

Picks below top 10 to play more than 100 NHL games.

Nonis: 2004 (4), 2005 (1), 2006 (1), 2007(0)
Total: 6 of 23 (26%)

Gills: 2008(0), 2009(2), 2010(0), 2011(0), 2012(2), 2013(0)
Total picks: 4 of 35 (11%)

Benning: 2014(3), 2015(2), 2016(0), 2017(1), 2018(0), 2019(1), 2020(0)
Total picks: 7 of 40 (17%)

Alvin: 2021(0)*, 2022(2)*, 2023(1.5)*, 2024(0)*
Total: 3.5 of 24 (15%)
*projected - being conservative
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: PuckMunchkin
No way and this makes no sense. Why would Canucks fans (who paid enough attention to the draft to attend the draft) be shocked at the selection of Pods thinking he would be gone already. If Pods was the popular choice most would have crossed their fingers and cheered when he was selected. This was not the case. It's like if we selected Kopitar instead of Bourdon (RIP) and saying the initial fan reaction from GM Place would have been shock "because everyone expected him to be gone already."

Sorry you're right, what I experienced first hand is wrong.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Coffee

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest posts

Ad

Ad