Tocchet basically said dont waste one until you have traffic in front. On one hand he's right, on the other hand it was highly telegraphed and only Huggy could make plays to get it on net with the added preasure the play being telegraphed cost us.
I don't know about all that, but it is kind of fun to rag on a guy who quite literally preached one thing, accountability, and then left when he felt there was a better opportunity. I can't really be serious throwing shade on anyone leaving this organization, and it is a rather low level of enjoyment, but after this season? I'm all for dragging that goof through the mud.It's not a big deal to me, I don't really care that he's gone...it seems to be a bigger deal to people who seem to be harboring a lot of ill will towards the guy for moving on...who really cares why he wanted out? Chances are he was hopeful to get the Philly job but didn't want to put his eggs in one basket...when you're out of work and looking for a job, people tend to interview in multiple places and then hope for the job that you want most to make you an offer. I guess if you only look at it through the lens that he had an offer to maintain the status quo and stay in Vancouver and chose somewhere else, then sure, he "bailed" on the team...but I think you need to be pretty emotionally abnormal to be butthurt about it. Maybe I'm just not a big enough fan anymore? lol
No I don't agree that saying Tocchet can go "F*** himself" is extreme. It's bad language but it's not considered hate speech or anything close to it.Yeah, a tongue in cheek comment I missed on first read....but unless the "he can go f*** himself" comment was tongue in cheek as well, it seems a little extreme, no? And no, I don't recall seeing anything from you that was over the top, but I also can't say I've read every comment on this 35-page thread either.![]()
I've responded to a couple in my previous discussions with you. I've made it pretty clear.Do you have a specific generalized comment as an example?
The key differences are key though. Here's an article from 1988:Pat Quinn gave a lot of lip service about caring about the team/franchise/city and then it turns out that as soon as his hot ex-GF in Vancouver broke up with someone else, he was negotiating with them while still under contract with LA. Then, he signed a contract with Vancouver while under contract with LA. NHL disagreed with his actions and prevented him from coaching for over 2 seasons.
They are similar stories with some key differences.
Pat being hired by the Canucks as GM and President is another key difference. A similar scenario would be if the Kings told Pat they wouldn't pick up his option year since they intend to come to a longer-term higher paying agreement with Pat whereby he would be named GM and Pat took the Canucks offer instead.When the Kings hired Quinn as their coach in May 1984, they offered him a three-year, $510,000 contract with a clause that stated if General Manager Rogie Vachon left the team “for any reason whatsoever” Quinn would automatically become the new general manager.
The Kings knew that Quinn wanted to ultimately become a general manager. He built into his contract a double-option designed to set him on that path. The Kings had two options to be exercised by Oct. 1, 1986. They could either make Quinn general manager the next three years, or extend his coaching contract for one year at a substantially higher salary.
The Kings also agreed when Quinn asked that his contract not be put on file with the league.
Quinn said, in court documents: “I knew, and the Los Angeles Kings knew, that if the Kings did not exercise either of the options and the contract was not filed, I was free during the course of the final season to deal with other clubs for future employment to begin after May 31, 1987.”
As the option deadline approached, Quinn asked for meetings with Vachon and team co-owner Jerry Buss. He was told the team would not negotiate during the season.
After the deadline had passed, Quinn’s attorneys began discussions with the Canucks.
On Dec. 26, Quinn told Vachon of the Vancouver deal. The news broke on Jan. 8. Nearly two weeks after they were informed of Quinn’s contract, the Kings reported the deal to the NHL.
...
If the Kings feel betrayed by Quinn, though, they have themselves to blame, as well as him. They knew Quinn wanted to become a general manager, they knew about the options in his contract and they knew his contract was not on file with the league, leaving him free to negotiate with other teams.
I've responded to a couple in my previous discussions with you. I've made it pretty clear.
tocchet just wants to grill with the boys in the practice facility parking lot
They also worry about Tocchet's prickly relationship with offensive players, citing Clayton Keller in Arizona and of course Elias Pettersson in Vancouver. They worry about his impact on some of the Flyers offensive players like Michkov and Konecny.
And the same writers are ticked that GM Michelle Briere has yet to surface pumping the tires on the Tocchet hire. Thus, speculation is that it was ownership rather than the front office, who actually wanted him. So the 'honeymoon' for the retuning Flyer great might be short-lived in the City of Brotherly Love.
But I suppose if his stint in Vancouver prepared Tocchet for anything, it's to stare down the media and the fans who in Philly can be hyper-critical as well. But his team had better get off to a strong start next season.
Tocchet takes the Philly job, as expected. Good luck to him.
Did anyone hear Brian Burke relay that he had heard Tocchet was out for the Canucks back in February?
So I'll just take that as a "no" and move on. I really wasn't looking to get into a full press defense of Rick Tocchet. lol
The stability obviously of ownership.
I walked around the practice facility, the bowels, there’s so many tools to work with. They have three sheets of ice. As a coach you’re like, ‘Oh my god!’ These are the things you want as a coach.
There’s a lot of draft picks, there’s a lot of prospects,
"I also disagree with your generalizations. People don't turn down millions of dollars for implied reasons to move back out East only to interview for a job close by because he's now unemployed. Plus he wasn't exactly unemployed. He had the TNT job."My exact words two posts before were "I also disagree with your generalizations" and explained what I disagreed with. If you're not willing to engage in reasoned discussions it is best for you to move on.
And the same writers are ticked that GM Michelle Briere has yet to surface pumping the tires on the Tocchet hire.
They can use team facilities but team staff, ie skills coaches, etc are no go or limited.Tocchet can talk about practice facilities but the implication that players care a lot about it and why they stay in the off season etc seems crazy. Correct me if I’m wrong but unless players get special permission from both NHL and NHLPA they can’t use team facilities in the off season.
Now it would be nice to have a great practice facility but it’s not like the team doesn’t have places to practice…
"I also disagree with your generalizations. People don't turn down millions of dollars for implied reasons to move back out East only to interview for a job close by because he's now unemployed. Plus he wasn't exactly unemployed. He had the TNT job."
So what was my generalization? That people typically do what they feel is in their best interests? Is what you disagree with? Because that is my argument, and if that's the case then we probably can't have a reasoned discussion, because that is just a simple fact.
I can only go by what you wrote and not what is in your head. You wrote "when you're out of work and looking for a job, people tend to interview in multiple places and then hope for the job that you want most to make you an offer."
This is a generalization I disagree with. As I explained, people don't turn down what is considered to be a lucrative contract for reasons of wanting to move away only to interview for pretty much the same job close by. Also, Tocchet had the TNT job and he was considered a top HC candidate. You are probably not aware of this, but if you're near the top of your field most don't interview at multiple places hoping for the job they want most to make them an offer.
I think you just can’t be on the ice with teamTocchet can talk about practice facilities but the implication that players care a lot about it and why they stay in the off season etc seems crazy. Correct me if I’m wrong but unless players get special permission from both NHL and NHLPA they can’t use team facilities in the off season.
Now it would be nice to have a great practice facility but it’s not like the team doesn’t have places to practice…
Tocchet can talk about practice facilities but the implication that players care a lot about it and why they stay in the off season etc seems crazy. Correct me if I’m wrong but unless players get special permission from both NHL and NHLPA they can’t use team facilities in the off season.
Now it would be nice to have a great practice facility but it’s not like the team doesn’t have places to practice…