Free Edler
Enjoy retirement, boys.
Irbe was pretty good here.. and he was free. He had some good years in Carolina during the dead puck and pillow pads era.
Really? They had 12 dead on scoring chances from my count that could've broke the teams back until they picked it up later on. He had pretty much zero margin for error in the first half of the game, was perfect and allowed the team to takeover. Which is funny because they took over in the last period of a back to back and down a dman.
I doubt you watched the first period then. The preds were dominating and with brochu would have been 4-0 most likely.
I meant now, in retrospect, everybody seems to lump him with some of the really awful ones.^^^
I don't think anyone necessarily turned on Auld. At least from what I remember. When he was dealt many still believed he had #1 upside.
Alex Auld was never better than Cloutier.I don't really understand why people turned on Auld. He wasn't great, but he was better than Cloutier and played average/solid enough that he usually didn't prevent the team from winning himself.
I also really liked Hedberg.
I did say they were dominating and Luongo was the reason it was 0-0.
Well watching the game caused me to catch up on some sleep. So both choices would have worked for you.
How did Ballard look today on the right? Didn't really notice him out there much (probably a good thing).
There is absolutely nothing wrong with basing some thought on personal opinion-- That should be the whole purpose of this board.
I think the team would benefit from riding the hot hand. I'm not saying it's an objective fact. Why is that silly?
".500" is now a meaningless term. It used to signify the exact average nhl team. Now anybody at .500 or below is a bad team.
Because it changes day to day. And there's no really consistent, objective measure. Would you not say Schneider had an excellent game last game? Should he not have then been in net this game? After his shut-out should we not have ridden him?
It just seems to me that people are consistently suggesting we 'ride the hot hand' in the face of a more compressed schedule, and where management seems to have a specific plan as to who starts when. Not having a go at you specifically, more the fact that this seems to be mentioned every time either goalie plays well.
I think someone did an analysis of the last 3-4 years and it showed that .560 is the actual, consistent midpoint.
Talk about a guy who was lucky to be there-anyway after the 1st luongo didn't see many quality shots.Good on em but I was sure it was going to be 0-0 in OT
Potvin was actually decent during the regular season.
Sadly he let in one of the worst goals in hockey history against detroit in the playoffs, which will never be forgotten.
Hmm that was Clouthier.
Potvin sucked and was outplayed by Bob Essensa.
Alex Auld was never better than Cloutier.
The year Cloutier had a knee injury and missed the season, Auld took the starting job and the Canucks missed the playoffs.
Cloutier had pretty good reg season numbers. He was just terrible in the playoffs.
I like the idea of both goalies playing ~24 games, and going with the hot hand at the end of the year.