hblueridgegal
We'll bounce back
I keep wondering what Chatty was thinking about this..
I keep wondering what Chatty was thinking about this..
I keep wondering what Chatty was thinking about this..
The 1st and 3rd goal were both cases of Kochetkov making a poor decision. He may not have had much of a chance either way on the first goal, but losing his stick and sitting on his ass gave him zero chance. Maybe he was just extra pumped about his chance to grab the reigns so was a bit too excited. We know he’s going to be feisty and aggressive, he just needs to be smarter about when to do so. That should come with more time.
Just saw the replay and I will say I'm honestly impressed that Kooch ALMOST got back over in time for the save...would have been epic if he had
I keep wondering what Chatty was thinking about this..
"Damn!" "Shit!" and "That is whack!'
He did have some good saves. But that's what made the decision funnier. He had already made some more traditional saves a few times with guys coming in on him more or less alone, so you'd think he'd try that again. But it's like he's got some sort of video game limit gauge that filled up with each regular save to the point where it was time to do something bat shit crazy.It was a bad play, but from what I saw of the highlights, Kochetkov also made a handful of outstanding saves. So much so that I wouldn't say he outright had a bad game. In any case Andersen has been the better goalie so far this year. We'll need them both.
Last night's game does make me wish we went out and got Kevin Lankinen though. I've always thought he was a good goalie, back from our days playing Chicago in the ole' Central Division.
I keep wondering what Chatty was thinking about this..
As a few of us has mentioned, there is a lot of space between playing too safe and what he did. He can make a routine (for him) aggressive poke check, he can attack aggressively like he did on the first goal and at least not make things quite so low percentage, he can try to make a normal, athletic save as he did a number of times in the game.It’s funny to claim that he “caused” that last goal. Say he had stayed in the net and Sprong simply sniped one past on the breakaway. Would he still be the cause of that goal?
The team gave up a breakaway at an inopportune time after struggling to handle Vancouver’s increased pressure all 3rd period. PK saw Sprong have a solid step on Chatfield and saw Sprong have his head down as he chased down the puck. He’s going to take the opportunity to surprise opposing players in that situation 99/100 times. It didn’t work out this time (well, it did, but Sprong was able to corral it afterwards). Doesn’t mean he should stop trying it, since it’s his style of play, and as @Navin R Slavin mentioned earlier, the last time we tried to get him to play “safe”, he was awful.
I think the fact that he immediately made a game-winning save on DeBrusk shortly after giving up that 3rd one speaks volumes. He was able to put it behind him and focus on the game, even when the team STILL struggled to defend in front of him.
Rod with a levelheaded take, for those who didn't stay up until the end of last night's postgame.
True, but hf fans are fickle. Not long ago, many Canes fans wanted Necas gone.Interesting, quite a few Canuck posters are "done" with EP and are willing to move him.
Was that the time he ate an elbow? I believe I have a memory of that. I think it was in years 2-3 where he started trying to cut to the middle and was greeted in the fashion of the time.Not gonna lie, seeing Blake try that spin move wearing number 53 reminded me of when Skinner tried a similar move (albeit higher in the zone in center ice) against Andy Sutton.