GDT: Canes vs Devils at noonish - news to me, too

[Tryamw]

Kuzy to Fast Fail

 

[LakeLivin]

It also says "Incidental contact with a goalkeeper will be permitted, and resulting goals allowed, when such contact is initiated outside of the goal crease". Not "may be permitted based on impact or how the ref feels it impacts the play". If it's incidental contact outside the crease, the goal is to be allowed. The ref's judgement is not supposed to be as to how much impact it has on the goaltender, only a determination as to whether the contact was intentional. It if wasn't intentional, they are supposed to have zero discretion. "Will be permitted" is mandatory, not optional. The goaltender's ability to make the initial save is only protected in the crease.

Noesen's contact was very clearly unintentional and the Toronto ruling relied on the impact to the goalie's ability to make the save, with is just flagrantly in violation of the black and white part of the rule. It's a blown f***ing call.

The overhead shot showed that the initial contact was Noesen's skate catching the goalie's skate while it was still in the blue. Whether or not that was enough to actually compromise his ability to make a save, it was apparently enough to confirm the call on the ice.

 

[Wolfpuck]

Nice feed from Kuzy to Fast.

 

[Tryamw]

Jarvis fail

 

[Tryamw]

M.T. Knett

 

[Unhinged Finn]

I haven't read this thread almost at all. How many jokes have been made about kuzie playing with koko?

"I like to play with koko, he gets me going"

 

[Tryamw]

Devils decide that M.T. Knett needs to stay on the Bench

 

[Nikishin Go Boom]

Bucci is worse than mike

 

[WreckingCrew]

Hughes jumps the FO twice, not thrown out

 

[Tryamw]

SVECH the EN!

 

[Wolfpuck]

Svech seals it!

 

[Nikishin Go Boom]

Boooooommmmm

 

[hblueridgegal]

The empty net king seals it

 

[Borsig]

svech the ENG specialist

 

[hockeynjune]

Svech empty net….again

 

[Finlandia WOAT]

Devils trying to skate through the Hurricanes neutral zone defense is certainly a decision

 

[Svechhammer]

Ooh man they toyed with them and made it look easy

 

[htdoc]

It also says "Incidental contact with a goalkeeper will be permitted, and resulting goals allowed, when such contact is initiated outside of the goal crease". Not "may be permitted based on impact or how the ref feels it impacts the play". If it's incidental contact outside the crease, the goal is to be allowed. The ref's judgement is not supposed to be as to how much impact it has on the goaltender, only a determination as to whether the contact was intentional. It if wasn't intentional, they are supposed to have zero discretion. "Will be permitted" is mandatory, not optional. The goaltender's ability to make the initial save is only protected in the crease.

Noesen's contact was very clearly unintentional and the Toronto ruling relied on the impact to the goalie's ability to make the save, with is just flagrantly in violation of the black and white part of the rule. It's a blown f***ing call.

Completely agree with you….

They blew it entirely…. Or they tried to say that was intentional contact instead of incidental, which also is a blown interpretation and call…

What’s the point of video review if they can’t even get it right with all the time in the world to follow the rules

 

[WreckingCrew]

This is our 7-8th fugly game in a row but at least it LOOKS like it'll be a W

 

[Rick Davis]

LOL has there ever been an M.T. Knett specialist like Svech?

 

[MrazeksVengeance]

GG EZ.

 

[Wolfpuck]

Eat poop refs.

 

[MisterDobz]

That was easy…..

 

[hockeynjune]

The empty net king seals it

On to those other devils

 

[TheOllieC]

Devils trying to skate through the Hurricanes defense is certainly a decision

I was about to say you have to give it to them for continuing to do the exact thing they’ve been having zero success doing