Also, while those kinds of players are great to have, you can't make an entire team out of them...at some point you NEED the guys who put up the big points and truly belong in the top-6, and to leave room in the bottom-six to help new/young players acclimate to the NHL game in a more sheltered roleYeah, he's similar to Martinook in that he's a good fit and any numbers he puts up is a nice bonus. But like Martinook, we've got to be careful about not overpaying him
100% this. If Robinson wants a lil pay increase, he's worth it. I think $1.5M is a fair number for both parties. If he wants much more, no thanks.I'm all for extending Robinson. We all expected the offensive numbers to go back to the mean, and they have, but his speed and PK has been valuable regardless of any hot streak. The thing is that if a younger player proves that he can stick in a bottom-six role long-term, players like Robinson/Carrier/Martinook will all be on easily-tradeable contracts. As of now, all three are much better than our farm guys, and we are in a contending context where those sort of depth improvements matter.
Have some flowers for nailing the Eric Robinson optimism when we first signed him.His production is pure bonus. He's still a good fit if he’s scoring 15 pts a year. He’s been able to play up in the lineup where he wasn’t expected to be when we signed him.