The scars of the past run too deep. No amount of winning will change that.
MySeek help. They’ve won 10 games in a row.
CDH has 7 minor penalties in 30 games … and I know he for sure had 2 in one game recently.I mean, we're still taking dumb penalties. It's just instead of Trocheck and Cole, it's KK and DeHann.
Or it's a bench penalty, which is a team dumb penalty.
Through 36 games:Not talked about enough how much our PK time decreased after just two guys got moved out of the roster.
Feel like there’s been like a 70% decrease in dumb penalties this year. Even think Svech has gotten much better too..
that's dumb. The scars of the past are from a totally different front office and coach, at a time when they were bottom of the league in spending.
Trust me, as a life long Chicago Cubs fan and life long Green Bay packer's fan, I know about scars of the past and how quickly they heal.
I prefer the boring ones where our goalies get shutouts and our players pot lots of goals.My
CDH has 7 minor penalties in 30 games … and I know he for sure had 2 in one game recently.
So 5 minors in 29 games.
Totally off this topic but tied to your job. I was watching a game the other night (Dallas maybe) in which for each player they showed a graphic on the screen with their shootout goals/attempts/%.I like how you assume the guy that's had injury troubles his entire career isn't just injured, but rather he's out because "he doesn't want to play"
Totally off this topic but tied to your job. I was watching a game the other night (Dallas maybe) in which for each player they showed a graphic on the screen with their shootout goals/attempts/%.
Can't the Canes production do that too?
that's dumb. The scars of the past are from a totally different front office and coach, at a time when they were bottom of the league in spending.
Trust me, as a life long Chicago Cubs fan and life long Green Bay packer's fan, I know about scars of the past and how quickly they heal.
Not really. Most of the kids I grew up with were Packers and Cubs fans. I grew up in the Upper Peninsula of Michigan but just a few blocks from Wisconsin. My Mom was from Wisconsin and my Dad from MI. I lived just under 2 hours from Green Bay and 4.5 hours from Chicago but almost 10 hours from Detroit. Most were Packer's fans and either Cubs or Brewers fans. There was the few oddballs that were Lions and Tiger's fans, but Detroit was 10 hours away so proximity wise, the Packers, Brewers and Cubs were the closest teams.Wait, what? One of these things is not like the other. . .
What?Poll needs more options this is not a binary question especially when you add time travel into the mix.
Not really. Most of the kids I grew up with were Packers and Cubs fans. I grew up in the Upper Peninsula of Michigan but just a few blocks from Wisconsin. My Mom was from Wisconsin and my Dad from MI. I lived just under 2 hours from Green Bay and 4.5 hours from Chicago but almost 10 hours from Detroit. Most were Packer's fans and either Cubs or Brewers fans. There was the few oddballs that were Lions and Tiger's fans, but Detroit was 10 hours away so proximity wise, the Packers, Brewers and Cubs were the closest teams.
My Dad was a diehard Cubs fan so I became a Cubs fan. Also, the only baseball we got to see as kids was WGN on cable with the Cubs so it only re-enforced it.
EDIT: and my brother and I had our own "sandlot" experience. We needed a baseball one day so played one day with my Dad's baseball which was signed by all the 69 Cubs, including Ernie Banks. He, thankfully, didn't get mad. I often wonder what happened with that ball.
What I was questioning was the huge difference between the history of those 2 franchises with respect to winning and scars. GB has more NFL championships than any other team. The Cubs were almost the epitome of losing (across all sports) for most of our lifetimes.
I certainly don't question being a fan of any 2 teams from different areas. Growing up, my favorite teams were the Packers, Celtics, SF Giants, and Canadiens (wasn't a hockey fan, only watched the Stanley Cup).
What I was questioning was the huge difference between the history of those 2 franchises with respect to winning and scars. GB has more NFL championships than any other team. The Cubs were almost the epitome of losing (across all sports) for most of our lifetimes.
I certainly don't question being a fan of any 2 teams from different areas. Growing up, my favorite teams were the Packers, Celtics, SF Giants, and Canadiens (wasn't a hockey fan, only watched the Stanley Cup).
I think you are missing that it was about the timeframe of fandom when it comes to the Packers.
I wasn't born or was too young to remember the glory days of NFL championships. I grew up when the Packers absolutely stunk. From 1968 to 1993, the Packer's made the playoffs only 2 times. We forget that now with the success once Favre and Rodger's arrived, but it was absolutely abysmal before that. So 26 years, 2 playoffs which is what I'm referring to. The Cubs had zero playoffs until 84 and 89.
So throughout my childhood and into my 20s, the two teams I followed the most had only 2-3 playoff appearances in ~25 years.
That's what I'm referring to when I say I know all too well about the scars of losing. I was almost 30 before one of those teams, the Packers, finally won a championship.