Canadian TV rights negotiations start January 1, 2025

Takuto Maruki

Ideal and the real
Dec 13, 2016
421
299
Brandon, Manitoba
It's going to be interesting to see if the trends that are cropping up within American TV bubbles (grossly overpaying for sports properties from legacy media, tech companies trying to get into the space) ultimately hold water up here. More then anything, even if the duopoly is insulating it massively, it's only a matter of time before the RSN apocalypse pops up here, mainly from Rogers deciding that it isn't worth it having a bunch of regional channels only really segmented by geography, and instead goes to the TSN model of 5 channels, with one as a designated second channel, the rest being overflow.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Optimistic Cynic

rojac

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Apr 5, 2007
13,310
3,146
Waterloo, ON
It's going to be interesting to see if the trends that are cropping up within American TV bubbles (grossly overpaying for sports properties from legacy media, tech companies trying to get into the space) ultimately hold water up here. More then anything, even if the duopoly is insulating it massively, it's only a matter of time before the RSN apocalypse pops up here, mainly from Rogers deciding that it isn't worth it having a bunch of regional channels only really segmented by geography, and instead goes to the TSN model of 5 channels, with one as a designated second channel, the rest being overflow.
 

varsaku

Registered User
Feb 14, 2014
2,675
908
United States
It's going to be interesting to see if the trends that are cropping up within American TV bubbles (grossly overpaying for sports properties from legacy media, tech companies trying to get into the space) ultimately hold water up here. More then anything, even if the duopoly is insulating it massively, it's only a matter of time before the RSN apocalypse pops up here, mainly from Rogers deciding that it isn't worth it having a bunch of regional channels only really segmented by geography, and instead goes to the TSN model of 5 channels, with one as a designated second channel, the rest being overflow.
They need to split the streaming and TV rights. Blackouts to prop up TV rights is probably turning away a lot of casual fans who don't have cable. No casual fan is going to get cable to watch the occasional big game.
 

Chileiceman

Registered User
Dec 14, 2004
10,011
861
Toronto
What would happen after 60 days and no deal with Rogers? Why is it to the NHL's benefit to have a window of negotiating exclusively with one broadcaster? Are they obligated by the contract to trigger this window at some point?

The NBA made their deal with an entire season to go on the old one, so maybe that's what the NHL is looking to do as well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Stumbledore

varsaku

Registered User
Feb 14, 2014
2,675
908
United States
What would happen after 60 days and no deal with Rogers? Why is it to the NHL's benefit to have a window of negotiating exclusively with one broadcaster? Are they obligated by the contract to trigger this window at some point?

The NBA made their deal with an entire season to go on the old one, so maybe that's what the NHL is looking to do as well.
I believe it is built into the contract to have an exclusive negotiating window.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Stumbledore

jkrdevil

UnRegistered User
Apr 24, 2006
43,247
13,406
Miami
Okay, so it's built into the contract, but what advantage or disadvantage does that present to either party?
The advantage for the broadcaster is it gives them an opportunity to strike a deal to extend the rights (and keep their programming without getting in a bidding war). For the league giving the current rights holder an exclusive window at the backend is an incentive to get them to pay more up front when the current deal is signed. It also helps relationships for future negotiations.

It’s kind of like a landlord selling a property that is being rented. Usually a tenant will get the first opportunity to buy. But if they can’t meet the price it goes to market.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad